Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 16:55:11 on Wed, 28 May 2008, D7666 remarked: Its nearly 6 hours afdter the event as a write this. Methinks http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/servic...ons/today.html by now ought to be saying something succinct than ''Train services are being disrupted due to an operating incident in the London Liverpool Street area. Now it's a "Problem near the railway" (my, what a wonderful way of giving no details at all) that may be fixed by 14.00. -- Roland Perry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 16:55:11 on Wed, 28 May 2008, D7666 remarked: Its nearly 6 hours afdter the event as a write this. Methinks http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/servic...ons/today.html by now ought to be saying something succinct than ''Train services are being disrupted due to an operating incident in the London Liverpool Street area. Now it's a "Problem near the railway" (my, what a wonderful way of giving no details at all) that may be fixed by 14.00. -- Roland Perry 'Near' as in 'above'? Brian |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 08:16:00 on Thu,
29 May 2008, BH Williams remarked: Now it's a "Problem near the railway" (my, what a wonderful way of giving no details at all) that may be fixed by 14.00. 'Near' as in 'above'? Exactly. I suppose "ten feet above" counts as "near" ![]() As I posted in another thread, the BBC's headline "Trains halted over bridge safety" could just as well have read "Trains halted under bridge safely". -- Roland Perry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:55:11 on Wed, 28 May 2008, D7666 remarked: Its nearly 6 hours afdter the event as a write this. Methinks http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/servic...ons/today.html by now ought to be saying something succinct than ''Train services are being disrupted due to an operating incident in the London Liverpool Street area. Now it's a "Problem near the railway" (my, what a wonderful way of giving no details at all) that may be fixed by 14.00. At least it's not specified as being "in the railway area". -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote in uk.railway on Thu, 29 May 2008 07:34:45 +0100
: In message , at 16:55:11 on Wed, 28 May 2008, D7666 remarked: Its nearly 6 hours afdter the event as a write this. Methinks http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/servic...ons/today.html by now ought to be saying something succinct than ''Train services are being disrupted due to an operating incident in the London Liverpool Street area. Now it's a "Problem near the railway" (my, what a wonderful way of giving no details at all) that may be fixed by 14.00. NEEA are saying (Thurs 1015) that there are "issues with access to Liverpool Street". |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Hillam wrote:
NEEA are saying (Thurs 1015) that there are "issues with access to Liverpool Street". The CIS Screens at NXEA stations describes it as "a problem with a railway bridge near Liverpool Street" |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 10:15:37 on
Thu, 29 May 2008, Dave Hillam ] remarked: by now ought to be saying something succinct than ''Train services are being disrupted due to an operating incident in the London Liverpool Street area. Now it's a "Problem near the railway" (my, what a wonderful way of giving no details at all) that may be fixed by 14.00. NEEA are saying (Thurs 1015) that there are "issues Bless them. with access to Liverpool Street". Primarily its station. -- Roland Perry |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Latest report from the BBC at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7424980.stm : "A Transport for London spokesman said 'just debris from engineering works' fell on the tracks rather than a partial bridge collapse as reported earlier. 'The contractors were jacking up the bridge. The jack collapsed and debris from the supports for the bridge fell onto the tracks. We are investigating the incident,' he said." -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard J." wrote in message m... Latest report from the BBC at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7424980.stm : "A Transport for London spokesman said 'just debris from engineering works' fell on the tracks rather than a partial bridge collapse as reported earlier. 'The contractors were jacking up the bridge. The jack collapsed and debris from the supports for the bridge fell onto the tracks. We are investigating the incident,' he said." The Times online has the following: "Services to and from Liverpool Street, in the City, were suspended at around 7.15pm last night after cladding fell from a newly constructed bridge over the tracks about 500m from the station. and... "A TFL spokesman said that the 1,800-tonne bridge was still on supports and was due to be shifted by about an inch into its final resting place when one of the jacks holding it up collapsed and the structure slipped by about eight inches. "That's what caused the debris to fall onto the tracks below," he said. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4024826.ece and it must be true because the picture shows a Mark 1 EMU approaching Clapham Junction for good measure... Paul |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 29 May, 11:22, "Paul Scott" wrote:
"Richard J." wrote in message m... Latest report from the BBC at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7424980.stm: "A Transport for London spokesman said 'just debris from engineering works' fell on the tracks rather than a partial bridge collapse as reported earlier. 'The contractors were jacking up the bridge. The jack collapsed and debris from the supports for the bridge fell onto the tracks. We are investigating the incident,' he said." The Times online has the following: "Services to and from Liverpool Street, in the City, were suspended at around 7.15pm last night after cladding fell from a newly constructed bridge over the tracks about 500m from the station. and... "A TFL spokesman said that the 1,800-tonne bridge was still on supports and was due to be shifted by about an inch into its final resting place when one of the jacks holding it up collapsed and the structure slipped by about eight inches. "That's what caused the debris to fall onto the tracks below," he said. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4024826.ece and it must be true because the picture shows a Mark 1 EMU approaching Clapham Junction for good measure... Paul Dparting from, I think. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RAIB Investigation into an incident at Warren Street station, Victoria Line, London Underground, 11 July 2011 | London Transport | |||
Operating Incident at Liverpool Street | London Transport | |||
Operating Incident at Liverpool Street | London Transport | |||
West London Line - new station operating! | London Transport | |||
Heathrow operating Hours | London Transport |