Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 14, 5:38 pm, John B wrote:
Yes in the short term. In the long term, it's likely to be more cost effective to not give a single manufacturer a monopoly in the supply of UK suburban rolling stock (and Siemens would've been justifiably ****ed off, given that a batch of dual-voltage 350s would be pretty much equivalent to a batch of 37xes). Who has copyright of the designs of these trains? Is it retained by the manufacturer or is it owned by the DfT? If the latter couldn't they just farm the work out to a number of seperate builders as has been done in the past on BR and LUL? B2003 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 15, 7:29 pm, Arthur Figgis wrote:
Generally the manufacturer, but the customer might own frilly bits like a fancy nose. Voyager noses have been mentioned in the past - Meridians are a bit different. AIUI the South Africans own the right to the nose of their Electrostars. I guess they nose a good deal when they see one ![]() Ahem. B2003 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wagn Rolling Stock | London Transport | |||
Wagn Rolling Stock | London Transport | |||
East London Line Rolling Stock Proposals | London Transport | |||
Rolling stock losses in the bombs | London Transport | |||
LUL rolling stock question | London Transport |