London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 21st 08, 07:40 AM posted to uk.transport.london
MIG MIG is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,154
Default Amersham

On Jul 21, 1:29*am, "John Rowland"
wrote:
wrote:
On 20 Jul, 21:46, "Richard J." wrote:
If you think that a total of 4 tph from Amersham (including
Chiltern) is insufficient, are you suggesting that London council
tax payers should subsidise an improved service to that
Buckinghamshire town?


Its either the *london* underground or it isn't. All this
who-pays-for- what over county boundaries that only matter to failed
wannabe politicians in town halls is just petty and pathetic. Last
time I looked Epping wasn't in london either , perhaps the central
line should be cut back to a skeleton service too?


AFAIK Epping Forest Council subsidises the frequent service.

If they're going
to run a metro service they should run a metro service , not pretend
its some country branch line.


Maybe LU should run every Metro in the world, all paid for by London
ratepayers?


If it was physically possible for all those metros to deliver workers
and punters to central London, there might be an argument.
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 21st 08, 08:11 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 842
Default Amersham

In message
, MIG
writes
On Jul 21, 1:29*am, "John Rowland"
wrote:
wrote:
On 20 Jul, 21:46, "Richard J." wrote:
If you think that a total of 4 tph from Amersham (including
Chiltern) is insufficient, are you suggesting that London council
tax payers should subsidise an improved service to that
Buckinghamshire town?


Its either the *london* underground or it isn't. All this
who-pays-for- what over county boundaries that only matter to failed
wannabe politicians in town halls is just petty and pathetic. Last
time I looked Epping wasn't in london either , perhaps the central
line should be cut back to a skeleton service too?


AFAIK Epping Forest Council subsidises the frequent service.

If they're going
to run a metro service they should run a metro service , not pretend
its some country branch line.


Maybe LU should run every Metro in the world, all paid for by London
ratepayers?


If it was physically possible for all those metros to deliver workers
and punters to central London, there might be an argument.


Have you not watched "Underground Ernie"?! There appear to be
connections to - at least - systems in Sydney, Paris and Moscow!

--
Ian Jelf, MITG
Birmingham, UK

Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England
http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amersham and Chesham 77002 London Transport 45 October 30th 12 09:23 AM
Amersham with Zone 1-6 railcard Clive Page[_3_] London Transport 28 June 20th 12 11:35 PM
Chesham/Amersham changes decided Paul Scott London Transport 16 February 13th 09 09:45 PM
Marylebone Amersham via Beaconsfield Walter Briscoe London Transport 4 November 13th 07 09:02 AM
Chiltern Services Between Amersham & Harrow Joe London Transport 45 February 25th 04 11:29 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017