Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 16 Sep, 10:01, Colin McKenzie wrote: John Rowland wrote: I've heard that TfL control all of the traffic lights in London... would that include the one in Beechcroft Rd SW17? In the sense that they'll have installed them and programmed them. The borough will have decided what to install where. In essence, yes, though it depends upon whether the road is controlled by the Borough or by TfL. TfL is responsible for major roads throughout Greater London - what was originally known as the Greater London Road Network (GLRN) but is now known as the TfL Road Network (TLRN) - these can all be easily identified as they're all Red Routes. All other public roads (apart from Motorways, which are the domain of the Highways Authority) are the responsibility of the Boroughs. AIUI with regards to the TLRN, TfL Streets is responsible for everything including the pavement, but acts in consultation with the Boroughs - so if a road is in need of a signal controlled crossing, for example if there's a new school, then the Borough will liaise with TfL. If however it is a Borough controlled road then - as Colin rightly says - TfL Streets are merely responsible for the installation, operation and maintenance of the traffic signals. I'm not sure what the financial arrangements are behind this, though I'd certainly imagine that the Boroughs have to pay for new installations. Anyway, Beechcroft Road is not part of the TLRN and so is a Borough controlled road - LB Wandsworth to be precise. The road is wide enough for two lanes of traffic, but it has been deliberately narrowed by barriers to one lane, and rather than give one direction priority (as they usually do when they deliberately narrow the road to one lane) they have installed traffic lights to alternate the flow. Persistent speeding problem, and a couple of head-ons before the lights went in? Likely to have been requested or at least approved by the majority of residents of the road. It's purpose is fairly obvious - to try and persuade traffic to use the parallel main road - i.e. Trinity Road - rather than rat-running along Beechcroft Road. There's also a secondary school along that road. If Boris wants to retime lights to reduce congestion, he could retime this installation to the scrapyard. I suggest you ask the borough what it's there for. Indeed. Incidentally, whilst we're vaguely on the topic, I am interested by the various statements on traffic light timings in London. Under Ken, we were told that many of the traffic light timings in London were in contravention of the relevant law (too short a pedestrian cross phase amongst other things) - so they got fixed. Now Boris comes in and says that actually many of the current timings are in contravention of the law. I'm sure it's actually more complicated than that, and I must admit I don't relish the thought of wading through some very technical statutory instruments in an attempt to get to the bottom of this - not least because I don't speak lingua trafficsignalia and will likely just end up totally befuddled - so does anyone here have any specialist knowledge on the matter (which extends beyond heresay heard at the cab rank or similar)? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dumb traffic lights | London Transport | |||
A40 traffic lights rephased? | London Transport | |||
A40 traffic lights rephased? | London Transport | |||
Camera like sensors on top of traffic lights | London Transport | |||
Traffic lights | London Transport |