Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 00:19:41 -0000, wrote:
"D7666" wrote in message ... On Nov 30, 4:47 am, Charles Ellson wrote: relays drop out causing an alarm; reset up to three times in succession before someone is sent Nope. Respond at first alarm with an emergency fault. At least thats how we do it on ''my'' bit of underground infrastructure. -- Perhaps there is a risk that something happened, and people might be on or around the tracks? You don't want to accidentally fry them. Going back to the ancient version that I experienced, the "reset up to X times before sending someone out" was to allow for transient faults caused by wind-blown metallic debris, flowing/pouring water etc. There should not be anyone on the tracks unless train crew have let them out after taking appropriate measures which would include application of a SCD; this should result in immediate re-tripping when it is attempted to reset the supply breaker rather than the delayed tripping which might be caused by debris or dangling bits of train. AFAIR (this was before radio was in use) evacuation was allowed to take place as immediately as necessary in the absence of communications after X seconds had passed since the application of the SCD to give time for the "reset X times then leave the power off and investigate" procedure to be achieved; otherwise if communication was available and/or there was no immediate need to evacuate then things proceeded as required/appropriate. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Harrow & Wealdstone lifts | London Transport | |||
Harrow & Wealdstone this morning! | London Transport | |||
Bakerloo Line beyond Harrow & Wealdstone | London Transport | |||
Bakerloo Line beyond Harrow & Wealdstone | London Transport | |||
Harrow & Wealdstone platforms | London Transport |