![]() |
Good to see the piccadilly line is as shit as ever
On Dec 9, 9:03 pm, James Farrar wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 04:11:35 -0800 (PST), wrote: That people think complaining about shonky service is nitpicking rather sums up this sad little island. It's not *that* you complain, it's the *way* you complain. Lassie would go online and claim her £4 customer charter voucher. Been there done that. However 4 quid doesn't make up for my wasted time. B2003 |
Good to see the piccadilly line is as shit as ever
On Dec 9, 9:03 pm, James Farrar wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:35:52 -0800 (PST), wrote: As for the paedo reference Eh? You're a moron. And you apparently can't read. Still , this is utl so no surprise there. B2003 |
Good to see the piccadilly line is as shit as ever
|
Good to see the piccadilly line is as shit as ever
|
Good to see the piccadilly line is as shit as ever
On Dec 9, 9:17 pm, James Farrar wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 13:08:21 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 9, 9:03 pm, James Farrar wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 05:35:52 -0800 (PST), wrote: As for the paedo reference Eh? You're a moron. And you apparently can't read. There was no "paedo reference" in the post to which you were replying. "Boltar wouldn't understand the concept of free beer ("I want lemonade, and I want it now!"), and probably thinks that 'sex' is something that happens between consenting fives and sevens. " What do you think consenting fives and sevens is refering to? Group sex with odd numbers? Now go find your ****ing braincell you idiot , it must be getting lonely by now. B2003 |
Good to see the piccadilly line is as shit as ever
On Dec 9, 9:17 pm, James Farrar wrote:
Been there done that. However 4 quid doesn't make up for my wasted time. ...so you decide to waste more of your oh-so-valuable time by moaning about it? That makes sense. Well you obviously have nothing better to do than make some inane non- reply so pot & kettle I think. B2003 |
Good to see the piccadilly line is as shit as ever
On Dec 9, 9:55 pm, Paul Corfield wrote:
I read it as a bit of obtuse humour where "sex" was really a reference to "six" given that numerically six is between five and seven. I Last time I looked this wasn't nz.transport - I think the actual intention is clear and it wasn't meant as a joke so **** him. B2003 |
Good to see the piccadilly line is as shit as ever
On Dec 9, 10:51*pm, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:20:21 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 9, 9:55 pm, Paul Corfield wrote: I read it as a bit of obtuse humour where "sex" was really a reference to "six" given that numerically six is between five and seven. I Last time I looked this wasn't nz.transport - I think the actual intention is clear and it wasn't meant as a joke so **** him. I think you are *really* making something out of nothing. From what I have seen of the "style" of Mr Heenan's posts he has a tendency to use extreme examples or humour to try to make a point. This is a case in point but I expect he is killing himself laughing at your very OTT reaction. I prefer Boltar, even though I'm a raving lefty and he thinks I am a sad ****** etc. It's because his rantings honestly reflect his state of mind and aren't windups or affectations. |
Good to see the piccadilly line is as shit as ever
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:51:01 +0000, Paul Corfield
wrote: On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:20:21 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 9, 9:55 pm, Paul Corfield wrote: I read it as a bit of obtuse humour where "sex" was really a reference to "six" given that numerically six is between five and seven. I Last time I looked this wasn't nz.transport - I think the actual intention is clear and it wasn't meant as a joke so **** him. I think you are *really* making something out of nothing. From what I have seen of the "style" of Mr Heenan's posts he has a tendency to use extreme examples or humour to try to make a point. This is a case in point but I expect he is killing himself laughing at your very OTT reaction. Indeed, Boltar's reaction is proving the point. |
Good to see the piccadilly line is as shit as ever
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 14:20:21 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Dec 9, 9:55 pm, Paul Corfield wrote: I read it as a bit of obtuse humour where "sex" was really a reference to "six" given that numerically six is between five and seven. I Last time I looked this wasn't nz.transport - I think the actual intention is clear Yes: it was to show you up as a humourless moron. Job done. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk