On Dec 19, 6:02*pm, Mizter T wrote:
On 19 Dec, 16:53, MIG wrote:





On 19 Dec, 16:30, Mizter T wrote:

(snip)

The explanation for the Southeastern ticket office being able to sell
Oyster products (which is a much more recent innovation) is surely the
simple one of demand. Southeastern were willing to do so (and earn the
resultant commission), and the DLR and TfL wants to make it easier for
people to be able to topup.

Just on this point, I think that willingness is the key factor.

Demand is plentiful all over the place, but it hasn't resulted in
willingness. *I remember remarking in the past how it was odd that the
most backward TOC at accepting PAYG was the most forward at selling
it

.
Er, it would be really rather daft for an NR station to sell Oyster
PAYG topups if they did not also accept PAYG on their trains from that
same station, would it not?

Not at all, given that the real demand is for travelcards on Oyster
(which people repeatedly tell me, and I know, is the solution to south-
Londoners getting screwed for £4 when occasionally extending by one
stop on LU).

I am not aware of any Oyster facility that issues only travelcards, so
if the facility to sell travelcards would necessarily allow PAYG
topups as well.


Sure, people who wanted to use it for bus-travelling purposes would be
helped out a bit, but not those who wanted to travel on the trains.

Of course if NR stations were to sell season Travelcards on Oyster,
then that would be a somewhat different proposition (and one that
would address your requirements MIG!). As well as other issues, I
wonder if the TOCs have issues about revenue distribution (in terms of
commission) when to comes to selling Travelcards on Oyster - as I said
earlier, perhaps by so doing they simply become agents for TfL when
they would instead prefer to keep the money to themselves - or at
least within the Rail Settlement Plan (RSP) revenue distribution
system (perhaps that way they can earn interest on it until they need
to give it away, whilst with Oyster they'd need to give the money to
TfL and wait for some of it to come back).

My card statements suggest that the card-only machine at Lewisham NR,
which I have used a few times, is owned by TfL. I don't see any
obvious connection with the DLR though. I've only used it to get
travelcards (and got paper ones on the many occasions when it was
broken).




SWT, supposedly ahead in the race to accept PAYG, certainly wasn't
much cop at selling it when I was last in the south western sticks
about a year ago.

SWT sell Oyster topups at Wimbledon and Richmond, though perhaps not
from all the ticket windows.

Because they are served by LU, like New Cross.


It's also slightly innocuous that Lewisham NR is nowhere near being
gated yet.

I fin it very hard to see how on earth Lewisham could ever be gated,
unless the through bus and cab road was totally done away with and it
was all one big gated complex encompassing both NR and DLR platforms
(with ticket offices near the main road?). That seems highly
improbable.

I didn't mean to imply that it ought to be. Just that the usual
motivation for NR to get involved with Oyster at all is when they want
to have barriers and barriers have to allow Oyster travelcards
through. This motivation doesn't exist at Lewisham, and yet they are
ahead of the game on selling it.


So instead let's consider gating just the NR platforms. Platforms 2
and 3 are directly accessible from the main (old) station building
whilst this also provides access to the old subway to platforms 1 and
4. However there are also subways from near the new ticket office on
the 'DLR concourse' to platforms 1 and 4 as well as the extra side
entrance to platform 3 (all the latter are currently closed for the
installation of lifts). The main station building could play host to
gates and would enclose the old subway, but I'm not sure whether it's
a realistic proposal to put gates on the other entrances to platforms
as well. Perhaps it could be done.


I am still mystified as to what the arrangement might be when all the
building works finish.