Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had a look around Shoreditch last night and all of the ramps and
viaducts joining the original ELL to the Broad Street Viaduct are now done, bar the very last arch over New Inn Yard. But even that has rebar and most of its formers in place and is just waiting for its concrete to be poured. But once it is, you'll be able to walk all the way from New Cross Gate to Dalston Junction without having to leap any gaps or crawl over scaffolding. Looks like the projected late 2009 opening date (six months early) might actually happen. U |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mr Thant" wrote in message ... I had a look around Shoreditch last night and all of the ramps and viaducts joining the original ELL to the Broad Street Viaduct are now done, bar the very last arch over New Inn Yard. But even that has rebar and most of its formers in place and is just waiting for its concrete to be poured. But once it is, you'll be able to walk all the way from New Cross Gate to Dalston Junction without having to leap any gaps or crawl over scaffolding. Looks like the projected late 2009 opening date (six months early) might actually happen. I wonder if the rolling stock delivery will turn out to be the obstacle to early opening, rather than the infrastructure? OTOH, could the infrastructure and rolling stock be ready, but awaiting the NR timetable change needed for the Sydenham corridor stopping services, presumably planned for May 2010? Paul S |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 30, 6:58*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote: OTOH, could the infrastructure and rolling stock be ready, but awaiting the NR timetable change needed for the Sydenham corridor stopping services, presumably planned for May 2010? Couldn't they just run to new cross and back in the meantime? B2003 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Dec 30, 6:58 pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: OTOH, could the infrastructure and rolling stock be ready, but awaiting the NR timetable change needed for the Sydenham corridor stopping services, presumably planned for May 2010? Couldn't they just run to new cross and back in the meantime? Yes, or even NXG, as the down line runs into the former terminating platform. I wonder if there'll be paths for a limited service to Crystal Palace and/or West Croydon anyway, I expect it's the full 8 tph LO service down that way that requires the major changes to Southern's existing timetable. Paul S |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Scott" wrote ...
I wonder if the rolling stock delivery will turn out to be the obstacle to early opening, rather than the infrastructure? OTOH, could the infrastructure and rolling stock be ready, but awaiting the NR timetable change needed for the Sydenham corridor stopping services, presumably planned for May 2010? Right first time - the stock is already subject to delay (citing 'problems with suppliers'), and may - or may not - be further delayed to save a little cash, especially if the pressure from the planned recipients of 313 units diminishes with the credit crunch (dread term!). Either way, a signficantly early start is unlikely, if only because new building around the tracks will almost certainly NOT finish early, unless property prices recover smartish. While 'bits' may be ahead of schedule, that will be unlikely to influence the project as a whole. -- Andrew |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Heenan wrote:
Either way, a signficantly early start is unlikely, if only because new building around the tracks will almost certainly NOT finish early, unless property prices recover smartish. Eh? The ELLx isn't being funded by property development, so whether developers of flats in the surrounding areas have cancelled them or not is of complete irrelevance to when the railway can be opened. And it's not a DLR Dagenham Dock type project that requires the new property to be built in order to have any demand for the service, either. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John B" wrote...
Andrew Heenan wrote: Either way, a signficantly early start is unlikely, if only because new building around the tracks will almost certainly NOT finish early, unless property prices recover smartish. Eh? The ELLx isn't being funded by property development, so whether developers of flats in the surrounding areas have cancelled them or not is of complete irrelevance to when the railway can be opened. I am not referring to funding, but the physical fact of building work scheduled to occur around the tracks up to a few weeks pre-re-opening. -- Andrew "If A is success in life, then A = x + y + z. Work is x; y is play; and z is keeping your mouth shut." ~ Albert Einstein |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Jan, 00:03, "Andrew Heenan" wrote:
I am not referring to funding, but the physical fact of building work scheduled to occur around the tracks up to a few weeks pre-re-opening. Do you know which building work exactly? The only thing I can think of is the development above Dalston Junction, which I have indeed seen referred to determining factor for the overall project schedule. Shoreditch High Street might also qualify, but that has an enormous concrete box specifically designed to allow building work to happen while trains are running. I don't know if Dalston Junction's been designed on the same principle. U |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 5, 1:41*am, "Andrew Heenan" wrote:
"Paul Scott" wrote ... I wonder if the rolling stock delivery will turn out to be the obstacle to early opening, rather than the infrastructure? OTOH, could the infrastructure and rolling stock be ready, but awaiting the NR timetable change needed for the Sydenham corridor stopping services, presumably planned for May 2010? Right first time - the stock is already subject to delay (citing 'problems with suppliers'), and may - or may not - be further delayed to save a little cash, especially if the pressure from the planned recipients of 313 units diminishes with the credit crunch (dread term!). Less demand for the class 313 units is more likely to lead to units for an early reopening. The plan is for the first, 3 car dual voltage 378s to replace the 508 and 313s, these would be followed by the 4 car DC only 378 units for the East London Line Extension and finally by the addition of a fourth coach to the initial dual voltage units plus some 4 car extra units. If 313s can be retained due to lower demands from FCC, then the early, dual voltage 378s could be released to the ELLX for any possible early start. I'd be surprised if there was any planned delays to delivery, other than due to supplier problems. The finance company would probably not be too happy to have the cash around to pay for the units, but be told that London Overgrond don't want them for 6 months. The first 378 has been at Willesden since before Christmas, although I've yet to see it out and about. It has, however, undergone testing on both AC and DC, before arrival. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 30, 10:35*am, Mr Thant
wrote: I had a look around Shoreditch last night and all of the ramps and viaducts joining the original ELL to the Broad Street Viaduct are now done, bar the very last arch over New Inn Yard. But even that has rebar and most of its formers in place and is just waiting for its concrete to be poured. But once it is, you'll be able to walk all the way from New Cross Gate to Dalston Junction without having to leap any gaps or crawl over scaffolding. Looks like the projected late 2009 opening date (six months early) might actually happen. WONDERFUL NEWS! Thank you for posting U. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Old trackbed next to central line | London Transport | |||
The East London Line is dead... Long live the East London Line | London Transport | |||
East London Line Extension | London Transport | |||
East London Line extension news | London Transport | |||
East London Line Extension (Who's gonna control it?) | London Transport |