Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Jan 15, 10:08 am, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 01:35:13 on Thu, 15 Jan 2009, remarked: Especially given that passenger numbers at heathrow are dropping according to this report. The whole thing stinks. We are in a "bust", so of course short-term passenger numbers are likely to fall. The new runway is (one possible) solution for the capacity required in the next "boom". If there's not going to be another "boom", we don't need a lot of things, including Crossrail. When you're in a bust you don't start spending billions on vanity projects. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The one (and only) good thing about this decision, is that it isn't a decision to spend their (aka our) money, but to allow a PLC to spend its money. If there is no business case for the plan, the banks wont lend BAA the funds. tim |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New third runway images released by Heathrow airport | London Transport | |||
Airport expansion: Heathrow runway 3 and Gatwick runway 2 constituteshortlist | London Transport | |||
New govt scraps Heathrow third runway | London Transport | |||
Harlington's Fate is Sealed - Third Runway only achieves 45% required capacity | London Transport | |||
Pollution test passed for third runway | London Transport News |