Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead
Peter Masson wrote:
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 10:48:31 on Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Peter Masson remarked: So there might be a case for diverting HEx (in tunnel, not wandering all round Cricklewood) to St Pancras. Would this be a new station at St Pancras, or maybe sharing the Kent domestic platforms, which might be over-specified. On the other hand, if Thameslink2012 does in fact include through-running from the GN services on the ECML, there will greater spare capacity at KX. I envisage an underground terminus, possibly double ended, with one entrance from the concourse at St Pancras (near the access to the Thameslink platforms, and another with an entrance from Euston (may need a travelator). It makes more sense to extend the Kent domestics from St P to Heathrow, with a reversal at St P. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead
"John Rowland" wrote in
message Peter Masson wrote: "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 10:48:31 on Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Peter Masson remarked: So there might be a case for diverting HEx (in tunnel, not wandering all round Cricklewood) to St Pancras. Would this be a new station at St Pancras, or maybe sharing the Kent domestic platforms, which might be over-specified. On the other hand, if Thameslink2012 does in fact include through-running from the GN services on the ECML, there will greater spare capacity at KX. I envisage an underground terminus, possibly double ended, with one entrance from the concourse at St Pancras (near the access to the Thameslink platforms, and another with an entrance from Euston (may need a travelator). It makes more sense to extend the Kent domestics from St P to Heathrow, with a reversal at St P. But as I understand it, Heathrow Hub is just the first station on HS2, en-route to the midlands or the west, not a terminus. I doubt that the current St P has enough domestic platforms (on either side) to be the London Terminus for the high speed link to the north. Also, are they long enough? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead
In message , at 13:51:50 on
Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Recliner remarked: I doubt that the current St P has enough domestic platforms (on either side) to be the London Terminus for the high speed link to the north. Also, are they long enough? Not enough of them, and they are approx 10 carriages long - is that sufficient? -- Roland Perry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
In message , at 13:51:50 on Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Recliner remarked: I doubt that the current St P has enough domestic platforms (on either side) to be the London Terminus for the high speed link to the north. Also, are they long enough? Not enough of them, and they are approx 10 carriages long - is that sufficient? I would have thought new high speed trains would be longer than that (even the Pendos will soon be 11 cars long). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead
In message , at 16:34:39 on
Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Recliner remarked: I doubt that the current St P has enough domestic platforms (on either side) to be the London Terminus for the high speed link to the north. Also, are they long enough? Not enough of them, and they are approx 10 carriages long - is that sufficient? I would have thought new high speed trains would be longer than that (even the Pendos will soon be 11 cars long). It would be awkward if the Javelins were longer. -- Roland Perry |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
In message , at 16:34:39 on Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Recliner remarked: I doubt that the current St P has enough domestic platforms (on either side) to be the London Terminus for the high speed link to the north. Also, are they long enough? Not enough of them, and they are approx 10 carriages long - is that sufficient? I would have thought new high speed trains would be longer than that (even the Pendos will soon be 11 cars long). It would be awkward if the Javelins were longer. The Class 395 trains are six cars long, but I don't know if they'll be running doubled up for some services. If so, I assume the Kent platforms can handle 12 trains. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead
"Recliner" wrote The Class 395 trains are six cars long, but I don't know if they'll be running doubled up for some services. If so, I assume the Kent platforms can handle 12 trains. AIUI the peak trains will be 12 cars, apart from the Rochester - St Pancras service which will be a single unit because of short platforms. The trains via Ashford will consist of separate portions from Thanet via Canterbury West and Dover, joining at Ashford. Peter |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New third runway images released by Heathrow airport | London Transport | |||
Airport expansion: Heathrow runway 3 and Gatwick runway 2 constituteshortlist | London Transport | |||
New govt scraps Heathrow third runway | London Transport | |||
Harlington's Fate is Sealed - Third Runway only achieves 45% required capacity | London Transport | |||
Pollution test passed for third runway | London Transport News |