London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 15th 09, 12:38 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,577
Default Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead

Peter Masson wrote:
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...
In message , at 10:48:31 on
Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Peter Masson remarked:
So there might be a case for diverting HEx (in tunnel, not wandering
all round Cricklewood) to St Pancras.


Would this be a new station at St Pancras, or maybe sharing the Kent
domestic platforms, which might be over-specified. On the other
hand, if Thameslink2012 does in fact include through-running from
the GN services on the ECML, there will greater spare capacity at KX.


I envisage an underground terminus, possibly double ended, with one
entrance from the concourse at St Pancras (near the access to the
Thameslink platforms, and another with an entrance from Euston (may
need a travelator).


It makes more sense to extend the Kent domestics from St P to Heathrow, with
a reversal at St P.


  #2   Report Post  
Old January 15th 09, 12:51 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,008
Default Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead

"John Rowland" wrote in
message
Peter Masson wrote:
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...
In message , at 10:48:31 on
Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Peter Masson remarked:
So there might be a case for diverting HEx (in tunnel, not
wandering all round Cricklewood) to St Pancras.

Would this be a new station at St Pancras, or maybe sharing the Kent
domestic platforms, which might be over-specified. On the other
hand, if Thameslink2012 does in fact include through-running from
the GN services on the ECML, there will greater spare capacity at
KX.


I envisage an underground terminus, possibly double ended, with one
entrance from the concourse at St Pancras (near the access to the
Thameslink platforms, and another with an entrance from Euston (may
need a travelator).


It makes more sense to extend the Kent domestics from St P to
Heathrow, with a reversal at St P.


But as I understand it, Heathrow Hub is just the first station on HS2,
en-route to the midlands or the west, not a terminus. I doubt that the
current St P has enough domestic platforms (on either side) to be the
London Terminus for the high speed link to the north. Also, are they
long enough?


  #3   Report Post  
Old January 15th 09, 02:28 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead

In message , at 13:51:50 on
Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Recliner remarked:
I doubt that the current St P has enough domestic platforms (on either
side) to be the London Terminus for the high speed link to the north.
Also, are they long enough?


Not enough of them, and they are approx 10 carriages long - is that
sufficient?
--
Roland Perry
  #4   Report Post  
Old January 15th 09, 03:34 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,008
Default Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead

"Roland Perry" wrote in message

In message , at 13:51:50 on
Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Recliner remarked:
I doubt that the current St P has enough domestic platforms (on
either side) to be the London Terminus for the high speed link to
the north. Also, are they long enough?


Not enough of them, and they are approx 10 carriages long - is that
sufficient?


I would have thought new high speed trains would be longer than that
(even the Pendos will soon be 11 cars long).


  #5   Report Post  
Old January 15th 09, 04:47 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead

In message , at 16:34:39 on
Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Recliner remarked:
I doubt that the current St P has enough domestic platforms (on
either side) to be the London Terminus for the high speed link to
the north. Also, are they long enough?


Not enough of them, and they are approx 10 carriages long - is that
sufficient?


I would have thought new high speed trains would be longer than that
(even the Pendos will soon be 11 cars long).


It would be awkward if the Javelins were longer.
--
Roland Perry


  #6   Report Post  
Old January 15th 09, 05:02 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,008
Default Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead

"Roland Perry" wrote in message

In message , at 16:34:39 on
Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Recliner remarked:
I doubt that the current St P has enough domestic platforms (on
either side) to be the London Terminus for the high speed link to
the north. Also, are they long enough?

Not enough of them, and they are approx 10 carriages long - is that
sufficient?


I would have thought new high speed trains would be longer than that
(even the Pendos will soon be 11 cars long).


It would be awkward if the Javelins were longer.


The Class 395 trains are six cars long, but I don't know if they'll be
running doubled up for some services. If so, I assume the Kent platforms
can handle 12 trains.


  #7   Report Post  
Old January 17th 09, 12:03 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2003
Posts: 559
Default Heathrow third runway to get the go ahead


"Recliner" wrote

The Class 395 trains are six cars long, but I don't know if they'll be
running doubled up for some services. If so, I assume the Kent platforms
can handle 12 trains.

AIUI the peak trains will be 12 cars, apart from the Rochester - St Pancras
service which will be a single unit because of short platforms. The trains
via Ashford will consist of separate portions from Thanet via Canterbury
West and Dover, joining at Ashford.

Peter


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New third runway images released by Heathrow airport Recliner[_3_] London Transport 5 October 7th 15 06:55 PM
Airport expansion: Heathrow runway 3 and Gatwick runway 2 constituteshortlist Basil Jet[_3_] London Transport 44 December 21st 13 12:12 PM
New govt scraps Heathrow third runway Basil Jet[_2_] London Transport 6 May 13th 10 04:18 PM
Harlington's Fate is Sealed - Third Runway only achieves 45% required capacity CJB London Transport 8 August 15th 07 04:53 PM
Pollution test passed for third runway TravelBot London Transport News 0 August 28th 06 08:24 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017