Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, MIG wrote:
On Apr 13, 12:14*pm, Tom Anderson wrote: Been reading the last issue of London Loop. In an article about work on the Northern line, it says: * There will be more trains too - making a total of 24 on the central and * northern branches, and 32 on the Morden section. Do they mean trains, or trains per hour? Or something else? And is that 24 on each branch, or between the two? I'm guessing the latter and the former, respectively! Are these the improvements that are due to resignalling but being attributed to splitting the line in order to justify the inconvenience caused by that, but then attributed to the signalling as well to justify the disruption caused by the signalling work, thus having all cakes and eating them? I don't know, but now i want cake. Are you suggesting that with the new signalling, the line could be run un-split and be as frequent and reliable as in the split case? tom -- Information is not knowledge. -- Albert Einstein |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Poor station toilets to meet their Waterloo - but passengers willhave to spend more than a penny | London Transport | |||
Northern Line trains terminating at Euston (southbound Bank branch) | London Transport | |||
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport | |||
More details on new victoria line trains...... | London Transport | |||
Arriva Trains Northern | London Transport |