Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Anderson" wrote :
Are you suggesting that with the new signalling, the line could be run un-split and be as frequent and reliable as in the split case? Most of the Northern Line unreliability originates at the Camden junctions, not at the southern end. A much higher number (and proportion) of West End trains could terminate at Morden, rather than Kennington, once the signalling allows a higher line capacity. The main reason that most City, rather than West End, trains continue to Morden is simply the limited reversing capacity at Kennington on that branch. But needless to say, failing to utilise what reversing capacity they have got is sold to us as a reliability gain, rather than what it really is - 'operational convenience'. And maybe softening us up for the line split During much of the 1990s, many more trains on the West End branch terminated at Morden; it's perfectly possible, and IIRC, the Tooting reversing facilities are underused, too. -- Andrew "She plays the tuba. It is the only instrument capable of imitating a distress call." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Poor station toilets to meet their Waterloo - but passengers willhave to spend more than a penny | London Transport | |||
Northern Line trains terminating at Euston (southbound Bank branch) | London Transport | |||
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport | |||
More details on new victoria line trains...... | London Transport | |||
Arriva Trains Northern | London Transport |