Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Tim Roll-Pickering wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote: What i don't get is why the off-peak pattern runs all through trains to Bank, reversing *everything* from CX. There, the density of trains is much lower, so the track issue is surely irrelevant - even with the awkward layout, you could surely run all trains to CX, and have space to reverse Banks? Since in the off-peak the Bank/CX demand ratio falls dramatically, this would serve people much better. Yes but in the eventual split Morden goes with the City, so preparing people for the idea that Charing Cross is accessible only by interchange is a good long term strategy for making the split acceptable. One can't make a strong opposition case to the split on the basis of these throughs being lost if they've already been lost. Crafty! tom -- Information is not knowledge. -- Albert Einstein |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Poor station toilets to meet their Waterloo - but passengers willhave to spend more than a penny | London Transport | |||
Northern Line trains terminating at Euston (southbound Bank branch) | London Transport | |||
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport | |||
More details on new victoria line trains...... | London Transport | |||
Arriva Trains Northern | London Transport |