Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Apr 23, 6:08*pm, "David A Stocks" wrote: "Mizter T" wrote: A few follow on thoughts about Shoreditch High Street (SHS) being put in zone 1. One thing I'd failed to include in my considerations above is the rail-only season ticket. Therefore, were SHS to have been in zone 2, then the calculation for price-conscious City commuters may have been between a rail-only season from say Sydenham to London Terminals (i.e. London Bridge/ Cannon Street) and either a season Travelcard (covering whatever zones were needed but excluding expensive z1) or Oyster PAYG single fares, whichever is the cheaper. From further out it makes a huge difference. I have been commuting from Hove/Brighton to Victoria for a number of years, and am contemplating the possibility of travelling to Hanger Lane every day instead. The current annual season ticket prices are roughly: Hove to London Terminals £3,500 (current ticket) Hove to Zones 1-6 * * * *£4,000 Hove to Zones 2-6 * * * *£3,000 (using Overground from CLJ to SPB) The relative savings afforded by avoiding zone 1 for journeys within London are perhaps comparable - again these are prices for annual seasons: Purley* to London Terminals £1,448 Zones 1-6 Travelcard £1,904 Zones 2-6 Travelcard £1,296 (*Purley price applies to any zone 6 Southern station to 'London Terminals') It certainly pays to avoid zone 1, as it does with 'London Terminals'. (Even just looking at off-peak Day Travelcards, the z2-6 at £5.10 is almost a third less than the z1-6 at £7.50.) The other thought I've just had is whether or not SHS would be classified as a 'London Terminal' - which is particularly relevant for journeys from south London, as it could mean that commuters could choose between heading to London Bridge/Cannon Street or SHS to get to the City. On the basis of the above figures I would say this would make a lot of sense - it would work a bit like City Thameslink does for journeys from the south. Hmm, I don't think that necessarily follows. It would undoubtedly be very useful, no doubt. However as the letters that London Travelwatch have published demonstrate, there was clear concern about revenue being abstracted from the TOCs and heading to TfL/LO (via the ELLX) - hence why SHS is going to be a zone 1 station rather than a zone 2 station - the fear of the TOCs being that pax would transfer to the ELLX to benefit from the cheaper fares. DfT agreed with this concern, and therefore stipulated that SHS would be in zone 1 (as part of the funding deal for ELLX phase 2b). *If* SHS was to be a 'London Terminal' for journeys from points south, then TfL/LO would get a cut of the revenue from tickets issued to 'London Terminals' as per the ATOC/RSP revenue allocation scheme (ORCATS). The TOCs and the DfT might well also regard this as revenue abstraction too - it might not be quite such a clear cut case, as ELLX would be adding to the total of trains heading from points south to 'London Terminals' - but I think it might well be regarded as just as unwelcome. The other possible point against it is that of concern about overcrowded trains at SHS, which would perhaps be more likely if 'London Terminals' tickets were valid to and from it as well - in other words if holders of 'London Terminals' season tickets were a fickle bunch and switched their allegiance between SHS and London Bridge/Cannon Street at the drop of a top-hat - or indeed a drop of rain - then this could lead to surges and dips in the pattern of usage at SHS and London Bridge/Cannon Street which could make things difficult for planners, and could lead to ELLX trains carrying cross- town traffic being overwhelmed at SHS. Then again, maybe not... I'm just thinking aloud! I think I used the ELL once, when I was working near Finsbury Square and my train from the coast shuddered to a halt at New Cross without much prospect of going further any time soon. I got to work .... eventually. I believe the ELL it was used by a significant-ish number of people for commuting to the City via the now defunct Shoreditch station off Brick Lane - I know someone who used to do just that! Canada Water and the interchange with the Jubilee line certainly increased the relevance of the ELL - there was a good deal of interchanging that went on there, and the ELL was a kind of feeder line from points south (and once ELLX opens this will be a very busy interchange point). I made occasional use of the ELL - it was a bit of a strange Underground line, but it certainly had its uses. The ELLX project will however help the line to fulfil lots more of its potential - even if SHS being in zone 1 does knock it back a bit. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ref: GMB/Unison members loss of statutory right of appeal againstdecisions of LPFA | London Transport | |||
The East London Line is dead... Long live the East London Line | London Transport | |||
Don't suffer from Hair Loss in London UK - get FREE Hair Loss Treatment | London Transport | |||
Wanted! : Vic Line WTT | London Transport | |||
500m pounds loss for L.U | London Transport |