In message . li, at
12:24:27 on Tue, 26 May 2009, Tom Anderson
remarked:
A trickle-charge point is equivalent to a 13A socket inside a house.

You want a bit more than a trickle charge - we were talking earlier
about the use of three-phase and up to 100amps.

But if you'd read either the Reg article or Mizter T's second post,
you'd know that Boris *is* talking about trickle charge - 2000 of the
points are to be 13A. Another 150 are to be 32A x 240V three-phase,
which in power terms are scarcely a problem (equivalent to about three
sockets rather than one), but will obviously access to a three-phase
supply. The 200A x 500V charge points aren't given a target number, as
they're still being investigated.

Unfortunately that number of charging points is a drop in the ocean.

Typical cars I've seen take about 3 hours at 12kw (that's 48amps) to
charge up.

That would put the amount of energy delivered at ~130 MJ.

The Reg reports that the 13A points will "charge a car over several
hours",

to *fully* charge would take 10 hours. Which is "several" in my book.

and that the 32A ones will "deliver a decent charge to an EV in roughly
30 minutes".

Decent is not full. It's enough to limp to the next charging point.

The former would put the power delivered at somewhere between 44 and 79
MJ, depending on where 'several' falls in the range 4-7 [1], the latter
at 13 MJ.

That's obviously quite a disparity - or rather, two disparities,
between your number and the Reg's, and the Reg's two numbers! I don't
know if someone's missed some zeroes, or if you've just seen some real
electron-guzzlers.

The orders of magnitude are very similar.

And having spent the last 30 struggling with a series of battery laptops
where the power characteristics were described by rabid optimists, I
have little faith that early (~ next 20 years) battery cars will be any
better.
--
Roland Perry