Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mizter T" wrote ...
The eventual outcome will almost certainly be that all fares totally within the zones will be based on the TfL system, and at a common price; journeys reaching outside the zones will continue as now - and, either way, the Railway_Clearing_House's successors will continue to divide the spondulux successfully they have continuously since 1842 on the national network. Wow, Andrew - you do so love bringing a confident sense of certainty when there's no real justification for it, and hence you end up making wrongheaded assumptions or jumping to simplistic conclusions. Re the idea that "all fares within the zones will be based on the TfL system" - in actual fact there's been some evidence to suggest that when Oyster PAYG is accepted across NR in London, the farescale adopted for single fares will be exactly the same as that which currently applies to NR in London (which is now uniform across all TOCs for journeys within the zones) - in other words Oyster PAYG won't offer a straightforward price advantage over buying paper tickets, and it will be more expensive than Tube PAYG fares. Snippy! I've as much right to speculate as you, and have no less evidence to back it up (ie none). The key words are "eventual outcome" - not what is now, and not what temporary compromises may be reached shortly; ultimately, the re-issuing of franchises will allow for a long term solution, and in Southern's case, probably the one after next. I'll take a bet with you that once the dust settles, fares *entirely within London's zonal area* become flat rate, zone-based fares, and the same on train / LOROL / Tube. Because it's clearly the most sensible, least confusing, and, if Oyster is to work (2012 etc), the only way to avoid never ending complaints of being overcharged. The one exception to the above that is conceivable (long term, still), is overground fares being higher than tube; it would be stupid, and unfair of those south of the river, but if they need a stupid compromise to silence ATOC (often the way, sadly), that could be it. But still uniform, zone based - because it makes sense. ATOC doesn't want it, the TOCs won't care (it'll be costed into franchise), but passengers will gain; it will be transparent. I envisage no advantage to PAYG, paper tickets or anything else; just one system for Londoners on London's trains. And it has to happen sooner or later for LOROL to function properly. £1.00 ? -- Andrew "She plays the tuba. It is the only instrument capable of imitating a distress call." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NR-only season tickets in London (was: Would it be lawful for non-London train and bus operators to share revenue?) | London Transport | |||
How much revenue is lost through passengers with no tickets on bendibuses | London Transport | |||
Revenue sharing between TfL and TOCs | London Transport | |||
Largest Bus Allocation | London Transport | |||
Revenue protection | London Transport |