Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thameslink already has two quite separate services, the metro (via the
Sutton Loop), and the Bedford to Brighton. It would make perfect sense for LOROL to control the metro service, but not the long distance. Except late at night when the trains run all stops Bedford - St P, and during the peaks when the service patterns get complicated. They also share stock and depots and drivers. It would take a major reorganisation to try to run the metro service as a separate operation. Not so. Since Govia days, their has been designated stock, and while there are exceptions, diagrams, trains and drivers could very easily be separated. By the time TL2000 is complete, there will be three, maybe four depots involved, so if sharing was too painful, one could be separated out. It really wouldn't be difficult, and would allow Boris' Lorol Map to look much better, while service levels (and possibly times) needn't change immediately at all; next would be the South London, followed by the Moorgate services, that neither WAGN nor CursedGroup have ever cared about. In fact there's really no reason why London shouldn't have its own network of all-stations-metro trains. Is there? And I'm sure the TOCS would be happy not be pressured to match LOROL's standards of station staffing ... Yes, it'll take years; it may even take a non-tory mayor or two. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NR-only season tickets in London (was: Would it be lawful for non-London train and bus operators to share revenue?) | London Transport | |||
How much revenue is lost through passengers with no tickets on bendibuses | London Transport | |||
Revenue sharing between TfL and TOCs | London Transport | |||
Largest Bus Allocation | London Transport | |||
Revenue protection | London Transport |