Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
378s to be unveiled today - BBC
"Tom Barry" wrote Yes, it's just annoying how badly it integrates with all the lines it crosses! You could hardly have done worse deliberately (particularly the Northern and Piccadilly, for the way they manage to avoid interchanging properly with both the NLL *and* the GOBLIN). I agree that the Goblin doesn't connect well, other than at its ends and with the Victoria at Blackhorse Road. But the NLL isn't as bad as you seem to imply. Hackney Central/Hackney Downs are very close. At Highbury & Islington there's a connection with the Victoria and Northern City lines, which themselves connect with the GNML and the Piccadilly at Finsbury Park. Camden Road is close to Camden Town, and it is impracticable to make great improvements, though a lot could be done to improve interchange at West Hampstead. There does seem to be a need for a passenger service between Willesden Junction and Ealing Broadway, as well as Slow Line platforms at Willesden Junction. Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
378s to be unveiled today - BBC
Peter Masson wrote:
Hackney Central/Hackney Downs are very close. I doubt if it's a fun walk after dark. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
378s to be unveiled today - BBC
On Jul 14, 2:53*pm, "Basil Jet" wrote: Peter Masson wrote: Hackney Central/Hackney Downs are very close. I doubt if it's a fun walk after dark. It's alright. However the difference between the staffed, clean and evidently cared for LO station at Hackney Central and the unstaffed Hackney Downs, with it's grotty little entrance on Dalston Lane that feels more like it was an afterthought or a subsidiary or side entrance, is quite noticeable. Which is stupid really, as Hackney Downs to Liverpool Street has metro-esque frequencies. Were there not some plans to somehow link the stations up directly? Whatever, the entrance situation at Hackney Downs can and should be radically improved (basically totally rebuilt - perhaps with the entrance directly under the bridge if it's possible to knowk through the brickwork there), and it should be staffed at all times too. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
378s to be unveiled today - BBC
On 14 July, 15:15, Mizter T wrote:
On Jul 14, 2:53*pm, "Basil Jet" wrote: Peter Masson wrote: Hackney Central/Hackney Downs are very close. I doubt if it's a fun walk after dark. It's alright. However the difference between the staffed, clean and evidently cared for LO station at Hackney Central and the unstaffed Hackney Downs, with it's grotty little entrance on Dalston Lane that feels more like it was an afterthought or a subsidiary or side entrance, is quite noticeable. Which is stupid really, as Hackney Downs to Liverpool Street has metro-esque frequencies. Were there not some plans to somehow link the stations up directly? Whatever, the entrance situation at Hackney Downs can and should be radically improved (basically totally rebuilt - perhaps with the entrance directly under the bridge if it's possible to knowk through the brickwork there), and it should be staffed at all times too. Yep - it's not the nicest walk (pretty rough blocks on once side) but in the 5 years I lived in the neighbourhood I walked between the stations regularly at all times of day and night, and never had the slightest problem. Fully agree on the naffness of Hackney Downs's (eats shoots and leaves?) entrance, and wish that they could solve the problem of the short-walk-but-not-really-an-interchange with Central. What about a more radical solution of closing the Downs station and building new platforms above the NLL? (I appreciate how unlikely this would be to ever be implemented....) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
378s to be unveiled today - BBC
snip
It's alright snip Yep - it's not the nicest walk (pretty rough blocks on once side) but in the 5 years I lived in the neighbourhood I walked between the stations regularly at all times of day and night, and never had the slightest problem. I too agree but would add that waiting on the platform at Hackney Downs can be a bit more perturbing. Also, without wanting to be a bore, may I mention that Hackney Downs is another station Google maps shows in the wrong place? A stranger to the station might well think from the map they have to go along Institute Place; and that is what Google directions indicate. -- R |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
378s to be unveiled today - BBC
There does seem to be a need for a passenger service between Willesden
Junction and Ealing Broadway Peter Interesting suggestion. While I don't disagree can you justify it? And, are you suggesting just that short hop or using that piece of track as part of something bigger (e.g. Barking (by electrifying Goblin) to Heathrow)? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
378s to be unveiled today - BBC
"Graham Harrison" wrote in message ... There does seem to be a need for a passenger service between Willesden Junction and Ealing Broadway Interesting suggestion. While I don't disagree can you justify it? And, are you suggesting just that short hop or using that piece of track as part of something bigger (e.g. Barking (by electrifying Goblin) to Heathrow)? I doubt that there'd be enough passengers to justify taking Heathrow paths away from HEx and HConn/Crossrail. But how about Barking - Gospel Oak (would need rebuilding so that through trains could call) - Willesden Junction - Ealing Broadway - Greenford. There would be same platform interchange at Ealing Broadway for Heathrow, and it would give a better route to Heathrow from the FCC Bedford line and the Jubilee Stanmore line (via West Hampstead), and, at least if Willesden Junction were ever to gain Slow Line platforms, the Milton Keynes line. IMHO curtailing the Ealing Greenford line to a shuttle from West Ealing will be a considerable disbenefit - passengers for the LUL District Line will have to change twice at West Ealing and Ealing Broadway, though passengers for the Central Line will be able to circulate the other way via Greenford. Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
378s to be unveiled today - BBC
Peter Masson wrote:
But how about Barking - Gospel Oak (would need rebuilding so that through trains could call) - Willesden Junction - Ealing Broadway - Greenford. Gospel Oak is one of the worst sited stations in London - its catchment area is a quarter parkland and a quarter cut off by other railways. Building platforms at Tufnell Park (with entrances at both ends of Churchill Road) and running the Greblin through Gospel Oak without stopping must have a better cost-benefit ratio. IMHO curtailing the Ealing Greenford line to a shuttle from West Ealing will be a considerable disbenefit - passengers for the LUL District Line will have to change twice at West Ealing and Ealing Broadway, though passengers for the Central Line will be able to circulate the other way via Greenford. But the curtailment must surely be to make capacity for other trains between West Ealing and Ealing Broadway, and your plan doesn't address that. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
378s to be unveiled today - BBC
"Peter Masson" wrote in message ... "Graham Harrison" wrote in message ... There does seem to be a need for a passenger service between Willesden Junction and Ealing Broadway Interesting suggestion. While I don't disagree can you justify it? And, are you suggesting just that short hop or using that piece of track as part of something bigger (e.g. Barking (by electrifying Goblin) to Heathrow)? I doubt that there'd be enough passengers to justify taking Heathrow paths away from HEx and HConn/Crossrail. But how about Barking - Gospel Oak (would need rebuilding so that through trains could call) - Willesden Junction - Ealing Broadway - Greenford. There would be same platform interchange at Ealing Broadway for Heathrow, and it would give a better route to Heathrow from the FCC Bedford line and the Jubilee Stanmore line (via West Hampstead), and, at least if Willesden Junction were ever to gain Slow Line platforms, the Milton Keynes line. IMHO curtailing the Ealing Greenford line to a shuttle from West Ealing will be a considerable disbenefit - passengers for the LUL District Line will have to change twice at West Ealing and Ealing Broadway, though passengers for the Central Line will be able to circulate the other way via Greenford. Peter I wonder if curtailment at West Ealing is about capacity through the flat junction? Which makes any use of the line up to the NLL from the GWML an issue as well. Combine the 2 routes and I suspect you have a complete no-no so long as they remain flat junctions. It all depends what the real target is. Willesden Junction to Ealing would be nice but I can't really see it's a requirement. Willesden Junction to Heathrow makes more sense but other than using the GWML/NLL link the only other route I can see would be through South Acton then along the (unelectrified) line to Kew, along the Hounslow loop to wherever Airtrack joins (if that ever happens and if the junctions point the right way). |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
378s to be unveiled today - BBC
"Graham Harrison" wrote I wonder if curtailment at West Ealing is about capacity through the flat junction? Which makes any use of the line up to the NLL from the GWML an issue as well. Combine the 2 routes and I suspect you have a complete no-no so long as they remain flat junctions. West Ealing will remain a flat junction, though current timetabling makes the best of it, with up and down Greenford trains passing each other at or close to the junction. The Crossrail proposals take the spur from Acton Wells round the back of Acton Main Line station, with a diveunder so that the down spur joins the down relief without conflicting with the up relief. Peter |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Final design for the "New Bus for London" (aka BorisBus / newRoutemaster) unveiled | London Transport | |||
New Bus for London unveiled | London Transport | |||
Class 378s stabled at Euston | London Transport | |||
Have any 378s actually operated yet? | London Transport | |||
Class 378s into service this week? | London Transport |