Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 06:35:07 on Thu, 23 Jul 2009, " remarked: I see that the DLR has "Custom House for ExCel", the latter being somewhere that might not survive in its current form during an extended recession. Why would that be a problem any more than the fact that there hasn't been a working Customs House there for ages either? The Customs House still exists I presume (just like the Royal Exchange I was in yesterday, but re-purposed). The Custom House is much less likely to disappear than ExCel is to be turned into something completely different with a new name, after people give up trying to run trade shows in a falling consumer market. But the ExCel site could still physically exist, even if it was used for something else. Just like the Custom House. What's the difference? Why shouldn't the ExCel lend its name to the station and the area, just like the Custom House did before it? But the ExCel complex would be renamed if someone else took it over, unlike Custom House. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Things Named After The Current Queen | London Transport | |||
TfL establishes a £2bn Commercial Paper Programme for short-term borrowing | London Transport | |||
Stations named after commercial entities | London Transport | |||
Kings Cross fire (1987) : final victim named | London Transport | |||
1987 King's Cross fire victim named | London Transport |