I'm not saying Labour is great: I AM saying the Conservatives were
considerably worse.


I don't think the penny has quite yet dropped as to what a f**king
great hole this Labour government, and Brown in particular, has
dropped us into compared to other tits ups.

There’s a whole magnitude of greater incompetence this time that’s
going to make even WW2 seem like the good old days.

On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:01:35 -0700 (PDT)
allanbonnetracy wrote:

I'm not saying Labour is great: I AM saying the Conservatives were
considerably worse.


I don't think the penny has quite yet dropped as to what a f**king
great hole this Labour government, and Brown in particular, has
dropped us into compared to other tits ups.

There=92s a whole magnitude of greater incompetence this time that=92s
going to make even WW2 seem like the good old days.

Quite. Even the Tories at their worst wouldn't have released a mass murdering
terrorist after 8 years just to gain favour with a corrupt dictator for
some trade. And no , I don't believe the SNP acted alone on this.

B2003

On 5 Oct, 15:33, wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 07:01:35 -0700 (PDT)

allanbonnetracy wrote:

I'm not saying Labour is great: I AM saying the Conservatives were
considerably worse.

I don't think the penny has quite yet dropped as to what a f**king
great hole this Labour government, and Brown in particular, has
dropped us into compared to other tits ups.

There=92s a whole magnitude of greater incompetence this time that=92s
going to make even WW2 seem like the good old days.

Quite. Even the Tories at their worst wouldn't have released a mass murdering
terrorist after 8 years just to gain favour with a corrupt dictator for
some trade. And no , I don't believe the SNP acted alone on this.

B2003

But they did allow the terrorist attack which killed his stepdaughter
to be launched from this country.

No one has a good record on Libya, and that patsy's release was just a
sideshow. Presumably the Americans changed their minds when it was
too late.

On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIG wrote:
No one has a good record on Libya, and that patsy's release was just a

Yeah , obviously a patsy. All the evidence was faked and the trial was a
showtrial. The conspiracy theorists have spoken so it must be true.

Just because the attack couldn't have been done by 1 man alone doesn't mean he
wasn't involved.

B2003

wrote in message
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIG wrote:
No one has a good record on Libya, and that patsy's release was just
a

Yeah , obviously a patsy. All the evidence was faked and the trial
was a showtrial. The conspiracy theorists have spoken so it must be
true.

Just because the attack couldn't have been done by 1 man alone
doesn't mean he wasn't involved.

Almost certainly, he wasn't (at least in this case). As a Libyan
intelligence officer, he may well have been involved in other terrorist
attacks, of course.

Recliner wrote:
wrote in message
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIG wrote:
No one has a good record on Libya, and that patsy's release was just
a
Yeah , obviously a patsy. All the evidence was faked and the trial
was a showtrial. The conspiracy theorists have spoken so it must be
true.

Just because the attack couldn't have been done by 1 man alone
doesn't mean he wasn't involved.

Almost certainly, he wasn't (at least in this case). As a Libyan
intelligence officer, he may well have been involved in other terrorist
attacks, of course.



....in any of which he would have been acting in the capacity of a state
operative of a one party state run by our mate Gaddafi. Anyway, it's
immaterial - the conviction was highly unsound.

As the man said, no one comes out of this well. Except the SNP, whose
dedication to principles of compassion regardless of the PR consequences
does them credit. The rest of them can get ****ed, particularly if they
ever used 9/11 as a pretext for invading Iraq.

Tom

On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:27:33 +0100
Tom Barry wrote:
....in any of which he would have been acting in the capacity of a state
operative of a one party state run by our mate Gaddafi. Anyway, it's
immaterial - the conviction was highly unsound.

Really? Care to fill us in with your profound insights as to why this is so?

As the man said, no one comes out of this well. Except the SNP, whose
dedication to principles of compassion regardless of the PR consequences
does them credit. The rest of them can get ****ed, particularly if they

LOL!

The only thing the SNP came out of it looking like is a bunch of pathetic
limp wristed halfwits under the thumb of westminster who want libya's assets.
"Compassion" - the important keyword for wet feminised guardianistas everywhere.

B2003

Recliner wrote:
wrote in message
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIG wrote:
No one has a good record on Libya, and that patsy's release was just
a
Yeah , obviously a patsy. All the evidence was faked and the trial
was a showtrial. The conspiracy theorists have spoken so it must be
true.

Just because the attack couldn't have been done by 1 man alone
doesn't mean he wasn't involved.

Almost certainly, he wasn't (at least in this case). As a Libyan
intelligence officer, he may well have been involved in other terrorist
attacks, of course.

Is he still alive, does anyone know?

"JNugent" wrote in message

Recliner wrote:
wrote in message
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIG wrote:
No one has a good record on Libya, and that patsy's release was
just a
Yeah , obviously a patsy. All the evidence was faked and the trial
was a showtrial. The conspiracy theorists have spoken so it must be
true.

Just because the attack couldn't have been done by 1 man alone
doesn't mean he wasn't involved.

Almost certainly, he wasn't (at least in this case). As a Libyan
intelligence officer, he may well have been involved in other
terrorist attacks, of course.

Is he still alive, does anyone know?

It would seem so -- this is the most recent news story I can find about
him:
www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/oct/02/abdelbaset-megrahi-documents-lockerbie-witness

On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:30:04 +0100
JNugent wrote:
Recliner wrote:
wrote in message
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIG wrote:
No one has a good record on Libya, and that patsy's release was just
a
Yeah , obviously a patsy. All the evidence was faked and the trial
was a showtrial. The conspiracy theorists have spoken so it must be
true.

Just because the attack couldn't have been done by 1 man alone
doesn't mean he wasn't involved.

Almost certainly, he wasn't (at least in this case). As a Libyan
intelligence officer, he may well have been involved in other terrorist
attacks, of course.

Is he still alive, does anyone know?

Of course he is. Only idiots (ie the SNP) believed that about-to-die BS.
Him and Ronnie Biggs will probably be able to have a release party together
next year some time as their release anniversaries come up.

B2003