Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
... In message , at 11:38:48 on Sun, 11 Oct 2009, Ian F. remarked: Never fly budget airlines. Pay the premium and just go on a normal airline. In many cases it doesn't work out to be much more. And it many cases it can be much less. You'll have to quote a few examples, because I've been flying round Europe at least once a month for the last three or four years, and I think I've only seen it once (a late evening Brussels-Heathrow with BA that came in at 26 Euros plus 56 Euro tax (~£70); not that Brussels is overwhelmed with Budget carriers). I recently flew by: BA to Inverness around £20 cheaper than EJ all in. BA to Budapest around £40 cheaper that EJ all in. BA to Naples £20 cheaper than EJ all in. I always try and avoid budget airlines if I can help it as they are not always cheaper and they cut too many corners. I still believe flying should be a comfortable form of transport, after all it can be quite stressful. It certainly should not be like a bus service. More often than not I only have to pay a few quid more, if not less, for an experience that is less stressful, and thus a lot more enjoyable, on a full service carrier. MC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 11, 3:32*pm, "MC" wrote:
certainly should not be like a bus service. *More often than not I only have to pay a few quid more, if not less, for an experience that is less stressful, and thus a lot more enjoyable, on a full service carrier. Thats a lot to pay for a free coffee and roll. -- Nick |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 07:38:23 -0700 (PDT), D7666
wrote: On Oct 11, 3:32*pm, "MC" wrote: certainly should not be like a bus service. *More often than not I only have to pay a few quid more, if not less, for an experience that is less stressful, and thus a lot more enjoyable, on a full service carrier. Thats a lot to pay for a free coffee and roll. It's also a lot to pay for flights that last for only between 40 minutes and two hours. For longer flights, I can see the point of paying for greater comfort. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
D7666 wrote:
On Oct 11, 3:32 pm, "MC" wrote: certainly should not be like a bus service. More often than not I only have to pay a few quid more, if not less, for an experience that is less stressful, and thus a lot more enjoyable, on a full service carrier. Thats a lot to pay for a free coffee and roll. -- Nick I's still rather pay that, rather than give Ryanair any of my money. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message .com, at
15:32:59 on Sun, 11 Oct 2009, MC remarked: I recently flew by: BA to Inverness around £20 cheaper than EJ all in. BA to Budapest around £40 cheaper that EJ all in. BA to Naples £20 cheaper than EJ all in. Originating where? Heathrow perhaps. BA have pretty much abandoned regional airports. If BA are flying those routes for the same-ish price as a low-cost booked the same amount in advance, then it's good news for people who can get to Heathrow. But note that BA will now be charging for seat assignments, and reportedly have scrapped food on short-haul. So becoming more like a budget airline. And I know that classic carriers can't compete on price with the budget airlines in "many cases" (rather than a few), nor is £20 "much cheaper". -- Roland Perry |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
news ![]() In message .com, at 15:32:59 on Sun, 11 Oct 2009, MC remarked: I recently flew by: BA to Inverness around £20 cheaper than EJ all in. BA to Budapest around £40 cheaper that EJ all in. BA to Naples £20 cheaper than EJ all in. Originating where? Heathrow perhaps. BA have pretty much abandoned regional airports. If BA are flying those routes for the same-ish price as a low-cost booked the same amount in advance, then it's good news for people who can get to Heathrow. Gatwick. Admittedly some "out of the way" airports are poorly served and you do not get much of a choice. I am quite lucky in that I have good public transport to my nearest Heathrow, Gatwick or Stansted. Although I still have to allow 2 hrs travel time. But note that BA will now be charging for seat assignments, and reportedly have scrapped food on short-haul. So becoming more like a budget airline. At least you get a seat assignment. Some budget airlines make you run for it in the hope of a decent seat and the older I get this is not an ideal solution for me ![]() 24 hours) assignment. After this time it is free and you can go online, check in and choose your seat or wait and get it assigned at the airport. Food on short haul has always been a little unnecessary, unless it was breakfast (which I believe they will still offer). BA will still offer beverages and a beer or two as well. And I know that classic carriers can't compete on price with the budget airlines in "many cases" (rather than a few), nor is £20 "much cheaper". It is when the flight was around £70. "EZY (U2)" ![]() MC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message .com, at 15:32:59 on Sun, 11 Oct 2009, MC remarked: I recently flew by: BA to Inverness around £20 cheaper than EJ all in. BA to Budapest around £40 cheaper that EJ all in. BA to Naples £20 cheaper than EJ all in. Originating where? Heathrow perhaps. BA have pretty much abandoned regional airports. If BA are flying those routes for the same-ish price as a low-cost booked the same amount in advance, then it's good news for people who can get to Heathrow. But note that BA will now be charging for seat assignments, and reportedly have scrapped food on short-haul. That's for well in advance, rather than the usual 24 hours. So becoming more like a budget airline. I somehow doubt that, although I've heard that Air Lingus is becoming more and more like a budget airline. And I know that classic carriers can't compete on price with the budget airlines in "many cases" (rather than a few), nor is £20 "much cheaper". Still prefer classic airlines. At least theior cabin staff don't behave like on the budget airlines. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 22:12:09 on Sun, 11
Oct 2009, " remarked: Still prefer classic airlines. At least theior cabin staff don't behave like on the budget airlines. I have no idea what you mean. I've been on five budget flights in the last week alone. The cabin staff were impeccable. -- Roland Perry |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() BA to Budapest around £40 cheaper that EJ all in. Not from Manchester, or should I say MAN? Jet2 are cheapest. And Ryanair have stopped Liverpool Budapest. So it's Jet2 or very expensive alternative. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MC" wrote in message
ster.com... "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 11:38:48 on Sun, 11 Oct 2009, Ian F. remarked: Never fly budget airlines. Pay the premium and just go on a normal airline. In many cases it doesn't work out to be much more. And it many cases it can be much less. You'll have to quote a few examples, because I've been flying round Europe at least once a month for the last three or four years, and I think I've only seen it once (a late evening Brussels-Heathrow with BA that came in at 26 Euros plus 56 Euro tax (~£70); not that Brussels is overwhelmed with Budget carriers). I recently flew by: BA to Inverness around £20 cheaper than EJ all in. BA to Budapest around £40 cheaper that EJ all in. BA to Naples £20 cheaper than EJ all in. Since when have EJ (New England Airlines) been flying to and from the UK? -- JohnT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Way to Paradise | London Transport | |||
Luton airport - Central London (Bayswater) | London Transport | |||
Best Station for Luton Airport... | London Transport | |||
Did you waft in from paradise? | London Transport | |||
Luton Airport | London Transport |