Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Dec, 15:49, (Neil Williams)
wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:49:26 +0000 (UTC), wrote: Oyster was introduced to benefit TfL, no one else. Rubbish. *It benefits passengers as well, by... 1. Removing any need for bus conductors, thus reducing the cost to TfL, and thus reducing fares (or reducing their increase). 2. Making buses move more quickly. 3. Removing the need to carry as much cash. 4. Removing the need to stop to buy a ticket. 5. Removing the need to predict whether you need a Travelcard at the start of the day or not. 6. Allowing journeys to be extended without stopping off to buy a ticket or indeed decide you wish to do it before boarding (give or take OEPs, which I disagree with as a concept). The opposite is true. When you are extending beyond the area covered, you can no longer get an extension without getting off to touch out or, if you don't use it for any part of the journey, you get charged an enormously-hiked cash fare. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Metropolitan Extending East. | London Transport | |||
TfL fares frozen for next year | London Transport | |||
Beck map 75th anniversary next year | London Transport | |||
Travelcard extending? | London Transport | |||
Extending the congestion charge zone | London Transport |