Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams wrote:
On Feb 22, 2:05 am, Mizter T wrote: Additionally many minicabs will also have a more obvious TfL "Private Hire" roundel (grey with blue bar) on display too, which allows them to pick up and set down passengers on red routes - this is shown in diagrammatic form on this TfL webpage (can't immediately find a photo on the web): I wondered what those were for - thanks. Though I don't understand why anyone - taxi, private hire, car, lorry or anything, should be stopping on a Red Route other than in a designated parking bay, as that negates the whole point of *having* a Red Route in the first place. And yet London's traffic basically works, on the whole. Junctions tend to be the pinch points. Taxis need to be hailable on red routes - without that, London would become, in tourists' eyes, the only city in the world where the taxis would always sail past and never pick you up. The huge number of one-way roads and banned turns mean that a taxi pulling around a corner from a red route to pick someone up might be putting the fare up by a fiver - it would significantly reducing the capacity of the fleet to carry people home at busy times. Taxis setting down on red routes is harder to justify. Since minicabs are only supposed to perform pre-booked journeys, I see little justification for allowing them to pick up on red routes, because finding the right person, checking they are the right person and reprogramming the satnav takes so much longer than someone hailing a taxi, saying where they are going and zooming away. -- We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 26, 2:03*pm, "Basil Jet"
wrote: Taxis need to be hailable on red routes - without that, London would become, in tourists' eyes, the only city in the world where the taxis would always sail past and never pick you up. The huge number of one-way roads and banned turns mean that a taxi pulling around a corner from a red route to pick someone up might be putting the fare up by a fiver - it would significantly reducing the capacity of the fleet to carry people home at busy times. Taxis setting down on red routes is harder to justify. Agreed to some extent, as setting down is so much slower as there is a financial transaction to perform. Another way of reducing the impact of this might perhaps be for taxis to accept Oyster PAYG? Neil |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Feb 26, 4:33*pm, Neil Williams wrote: On Feb 26, 2:03*pm, "Basil Jet" wrote: Taxis need to be hailable on red routes - without that, London would become, in tourists' eyes, the only city in the world where the taxis would always sail past and never pick you up. The huge number of one-way roads and banned turns mean that a taxi pulling around a corner from a red route to pick someone up might be putting the fare up by a fiver - it would significantly reducing the capacity of the fleet to carry people home at busy times. Taxis setting down on red routes is harder to justify. Agreed to some extent, as setting down is so much slower as there is a financial transaction to perform. *Another way of reducing the impact of this might perhaps be for taxis to accept Oyster PAYG? Err, see what started this thread - giving shifty minicab drivers the ability to devour your Oyster PAYG credit probably ain't a winning idea. I should get round to offer the counterpoint to the above, if only to balance things out. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, Mizter T writes Agreed to some extent, as setting down is so much slower as there is a financial transaction to perform. *Another way of reducing the impact of this might perhaps be for taxis to accept Oyster PAYG? Err, see what started this thread - giving shifty minicab drivers the ability to devour your Oyster PAYG credit probably ain't a winning idea. I should get round to offer the counterpoint to the above, if only to balance things out. I'm sure someone will be along shortly to point out that a Taxi driver isn't a 'shifty minicab driver'. Apples and Oranges innit? -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Feb 26, 6:30*pm, Steve Fitzgerald ] wrote: Mizter T writes Agreed to some extent, as setting down is so much slower as there is a financial transaction to perform. Another way of reducing the impact of this might perhaps be for taxis to accept Oyster PAYG? Err, see what started this thread - giving shifty minicab drivers the ability to devour your Oyster PAYG credit probably ain't a winning idea. I should get round to offer the counterpoint to the above, if only to balance things out. (A somewhat clumsy sentence on my part, but YKWIM). I'm sure someone will be along shortly to point out that a Taxi driver isn't a 'shifty minicab driver'. I wasn't suggesting they would be. Apples and Oranges innit? I'm totally aware of the difference (I be a Londoner after all!), and wasn't confusing them together, though I see that what I wrote may have successfully confused nonetheless! I was thinking that the suggestion was perhaps to give both Taxi *and* minicab drivers the ability to take payment by Oyster PAYG - but thinking and reading it through again, given 'Basi Jet' and Neil were discussing stopping on red routes and were in apparent agreement that minicabs needn't have this right, I suppose Neil was only thinking about black cabs (proper Taxis, whatever you want to call them). FWIW I think there is an argument in favour of letting minicabs stop on red routes (i.e. what is currently allowed), though the best place for me to put it forward would be in response to Basil Jet's post upthread. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:28:52AM -0800, Mizter T wrote:
I was thinking that the suggestion was perhaps to give both Taxi *and* minicab drivers the ability to take payment by Oyster PAYG They won't like that - think of the tips, most of which are "keep the change" as opposed to "hmm, the bill's GBP7.40, so add 10% and make it GBP8.14 my good man". And there's nothing "shifty" about minicab drivers. Not, at least, if you use a minicab instead of a random stranger touting for business on the street illegally. If a minicab driver rips you off on your Oyster card, well, you and TfL will know who it was, or at least which company it was, and they'll be strongly incentivised not to do that. -- David Cantrell | Minister for Arbitrary Justice Perl: the only language that makes Welsh look acceptable |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Cantrell wrote:
And there's nothing "shifty" about minicab drivers. Not, at least, if you use a minicab instead of a random stranger touting for business on the street illegally. If a minicab driver rips you off on your Oyster card, well, you and TfL will know who it was, or at least which company it was, and they'll be strongly incentivised not to do that. Like the way Lewis Day Minicabs were strongly incentivised not to swindle quarter of a million quid out of the NHS? -- We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26.02.10 18:30, Steve Fitzgerald wrote:
In message , Mizter T writes Agreed to some extent, as setting down is so much slower as there is a financial transaction to perform. Another way of reducing the impact of this might perhaps be for taxis to accept Oyster PAYG? Err, see what started this thread - giving shifty minicab drivers the ability to devour your Oyster PAYG credit probably ain't a winning idea. I should get round to offer the counterpoint to the above, if only to balance things out. I'm sure someone will be along shortly to point out that a Taxi driver isn't a 'shifty minicab driver'. Apples and Oranges innit? Some Taxi drivers themselves are extremely shifty. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bicycle insurance | London Transport | |||
Insurance – Auto, Life, Home Owner, Health – State Farm | London Transport | |||
Car Insurance a Small Step to Get a Big Service | London Transport | |||
LU multiple-aspect signalling | London Transport | |||
Multiple Buses | London Transport |