On Aug 12, 4:27*pm, wrote:

(Alistair Bell) wrote:
I'm not saying any of this would be all that cheap (fer cryin' out
loud, look how much we spent on the supposedly simple East London
Line) but it probably _is_ cheap enough to be feasible if it's
desirable. (Not in the current Coalition 'let's slash everything'
mindset, of course.)

The outgoing Labour Government's "I'm afraid there's no money left"
mindset, you mean?

So how's this working then - do you have a leased line between
Millbank and Cowley Street yet?

(I merely jest ;-)

In article
,
(Mizter T) wrote:

On Aug 12, 4:27*pm, wrote:

(Alistair Bell) wrote:
I'm not saying any of this would be all that cheap (fer cryin' out
loud, look how much we spent on the supposedly simple East London
Line) but it probably _is_ cheap enough to be feasible if it's
desirable. (Not in the current Coalition 'let's slash everything'
mindset, of course.)

The outgoing Labour Government's "I'm afraid there's no money left"
mindset, you mean?

So how's this working then - do you have a leased line between
Millbank and Cowley Street yet?

(I merely jest ;-)

:-)

I'm not sure where you were referring to by "Millbank". I was there (No.4)
today but not for anything you were thinking of, I'm sure.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

On Aug 12, 8:49*pm, wrote:

(Mizter T) wrote:

On Aug 12, 4:27*pm, wrote:

(Alistair Bell) wrote:
I'm not saying any of this would be all that cheap (fer cryin' out
loud, look how much we spent on the supposedly simple East London
Line) but it probably _is_ cheap enough to be feasible if it's
desirable. (Not in the current Coalition 'let's slash everything'
mindset, of course.)

The outgoing Labour Government's "I'm afraid there's no money left"
mindset, you mean?

So how's this working then - do you have a leased line between
Millbank and Cowley Street yet?

(I merely jest ;-)

:-)

I'm not sure where you were referring to by "Millbank". I was there (No.4)
today but not for anything you were thinking of, I'm sure.

No, not No. 4, the home of the hacks and the collapsed atrium - I
refer to 30 Millbank, aka the Tower formerly inhabited by the rose-
tinted nouveau prole party, but now home to the legion of landed
gentry, with whom I understand your permissive posse presently have an
arrangement of some sort... ;-)

In article
,
(Mizter T) wrote:

On Aug 12, 8:49*pm, wrote:

(Mizter T) wrote:

On Aug 12, 4:27*pm, wrote:

(Alistair Bell) wrote:
I'm not saying any of this would be all that cheap (fer cryin'
out loud, look how much we spent on the supposedly simple East
London Line) but it probably _is_ cheap enough to be feasible
if it's desirable. (Not in the current Coalition 'let's slash
everything' mindset, of course.)

The outgoing Labour Government's "I'm afraid there's no money
left" mindset, you mean?

So how's this working then - do you have a leased line between
Millbank and Cowley Street yet?

(I merely jest ;-)

:-)

I'm not sure where you were referring to by "Millbank". I was there
(No.4) today but not for anything you were thinking of, I'm sure.

No, not No. 4, the home of the hacks and the collapsed atrium - I
refer to 30 Millbank, aka the Tower formerly inhabited by the rose-
tinted nouveau prole party, but now home to the legion of landed
gentry, with whom I understand your permissive posse presently have an
arrangement of some sort... ;-)

I know nothing of this. You shouldn't believe all you read in the press,
as they say...

--
Colin Rosenstiel

On Aug 12, 10:36*pm, wrote:

(Mizter T) wrote:

On Aug 12, 8:49*pm, wrote:

(Mizter T) wrote:

On Aug 12, 4:27*pm, wrote:
[snip]
The outgoing Labour Government's "I'm afraid there's no money
left" mindset, you mean?

So how's this working then - do you have a leased line between
Millbank and Cowley Street yet?

(I merely jest ;-)

:-)

I'm not sure where you were referring to by "Millbank". I was there
(No.4) today but not for anything you were thinking of, I'm sure.

No, not No. 4, the home of the hacks and the collapsed atrium - I
refer to 30 Millbank, aka the Tower formerly inhabited by the rose-
tinted nouveau prole party, but now home to the legion of landed
gentry, with whom I understand your permissive posse presently have an
arrangement of some sort... ;-)

I know nothing of this. You shouldn't believe all you read in the press,
as they say...

Crossed wires here, or rather crossed leased lines - I didn't read it
in the press, I made it up! A gentle bit of joshing, that's all, for
in an earlier post you appeared to be toeing the party line! ;-)
(That's not to say that I think the piggy bank is full, not at all!)

In article
,
(Mizter T) wrote:

On Aug 12, 10:36*pm, wrote:

(Mizter T) wrote:

On Aug 12, 8:49*pm, wrote:

(Mizter T) wrote:

On Aug 12, 4:27*pm, wrote:
[snip]
The outgoing Labour Government's "I'm afraid there's no money
left" mindset, you mean?

So how's this working then - do you have a leased line between
Millbank and Cowley Street yet?

(I merely jest ;-)

:-)

I'm not sure where you were referring to by "Millbank". I was
there (No.4) today but not for anything you were thinking of, I'm
sure.

No, not No. 4, the home of the hacks and the collapsed atrium - I
refer to 30 Millbank, aka the Tower formerly inhabited by the rose-
tinted nouveau prole party, but now home to the legion of landed
gentry, with whom I understand your permissive posse presently have
an arrangement of some sort... ;-)

I know nothing of this. You shouldn't believe all you read in the
press, as they say...

Crossed wires here, or rather crossed leased lines - I didn't read it
in the press, I made it up! A gentle bit of joshing, that's all, for
in an earlier post you appeared to be toeing the party line! ;-)
(That's not to say that I think the piggy bank is full, not at all!)

:-)

--
Colin Rosenstiel