Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
news ![]() [snip] Curious. The trains are timetabled at only 125MPH, with higher speeds only used to catch up when running late. Presumably the speeds in tunnel are lower still? |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 8, 5:55*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote: I'd also propose that NO trains have been 'sidelined' at any time. Some are modified, and some aren't, that's all. Still in service, then? The Standard seemed to be reporting as if they'd all been withdrawn for mods with all trains cancelled. Is the lurching any worse than, say, a Pendolino through Berkhamsted (just before Berko there is a particularly bad lurch and bang where the tilt mechanism reaches its full extent at the same time as a bad bit of track makes the suspension bottom and the cant increases). Actually, I've been tempted to report it in case there's actually something wrong - does anyone else know what I mean and have a view? Neil |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams wrote:
On Sep 8, 5:55*pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: I'd also propose that NO trains have been 'sidelined' at any time. Some are modified, and some aren't, that's all. Still in service, then? The Standard seemed to be reporting as if they'd all been withdrawn for mods with all trains cancelled. Is the lurching any worse than, say, a Pendolino through Berkhamsted (just before Berko there is a particularly bad lurch and bang where the tilt mechanism reaches its full extent at the same time as a bad bit of track makes the suspension bottom and the cant increases). Actually, I've been tempted to report it in case there's actually something wrong - does anyone else know what I mean and have a view? I think I know exactly what you mean. There was a particular spot on my commute home from London to Haywards Heath/Brighton where there was a terrific 'lurch', just south of Redhill station where the "Quarry Line" (Redhill-avoiding main line) rejoined the line that runs through Redhill station. It was at its worst in seats at the trailing ends of Class 319 coaches, or in the motor coach of a 4-BIG, CIG or VEP when the suspension would bottom out with a bang. I did report it, several times, as did many other passengers (apparently) and eventually some work was done to the track that reduced the 'lurch' to something more tolerable. What you have described as 'lurching' that is pretty common in Pendolinos. I've had about 15-16 trips in them this year, all north of Milton Keynes, and they all suffer that problem at several points between Rugby and Stafford - to the point where I doubt they were ever credibly going to run in service at 140 mph as I have said on here before. The 'hunting' of the Class 395s is quite different. Rather than a one-off 'lurch' at a particular location, 'hunting' is a resonant oscillation of a dynamic system that can continue for several minutes. It is loud, uncomfortable and unpleasant. It can be quite alarming to passengers because it is quite clearly uncontrolled, even though it probably poses a low risk to safety. This continuous 'hunting' is therefore quite different from the one-off 'lurching'. |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Sep, 10:29, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sep 8, 5:55*pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: I'd also propose that NO trains have been 'sidelined' at any time. Some are modified, and some aren't, that's all. Still in service, then? *The Standard seemed to be reporting as if they'd all been withdrawn for mods with all trains cancelled. Is the lurching any worse than, say, a Pendolino through Berkhamsted (just before Berko there is a particularly bad lurch and bang where the tilt mechanism reaches its full extent at the same time as a bad bit of track makes the suspension bottom and the cant increases). Actually, I've been tempted to report it in case there's actually something wrong - does anyone else know what I mean and have a view? Neil No, it's old fashioned hunting due to the lateral damping being too soft. solved by a simple mod. Roger |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On Sep 9, 10:29*am, Neil Williams wrote: On Sep 8, 5:55*pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: I'd also propose that NO trains have been 'sidelined' at any time. Some are modified, and some aren't, that's all. Still in service, then? *The Standard seemed to be reporting as if they'd all been withdrawn for mods with all trains cancelled. The Standard report is thoroughly misleading - they're still in service, but trains are being taken out of service for mods. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ivor The Engine" wrote in message ... On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 20:49:35 +0100, Roland Perry wrote: I must go down and scout it out when it's finished. Hopefully the entrance to the park is near the station (like the Dome), not half a mile round the corner? Apparently the entrance will be at the station but people face a walk of up to a mile to get to some of the venues... How shocking! People will have to do some exercise? And at an Olympic site?! This sort of thing should be stopped at once! ;-) |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Recliner" wrote in message ... wrote in message news ![]() [snip] Curious. The trains are timetabled at only 125MPH, with higher speeds only used to catch up when running late. Presumably the speeds in tunnel are lower still? No, the max speed in the newer section from Southfleet Jn to London is 230 km/h (140 mph). It is Eurostar that is running below normal speed in this whole section, including the London tunnels... The proper LGV speeds cease where they used to turn off into South London Paul S |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Ivor The Engine
writes Apparently the entrance will be at the station but people face a walk of up to a mile to get to some of the venues... More like a walk of 150 miles to get to the furthest venue. ![]() Actually, I doubt that the public would have to walk as far as a mile to get to any of the venues within the park, as the more distant areas from the entrance are not for the public (e.g. the athletes' warm-up area and the huge media centre are both on the far perimeter). The Olympic Park is actually quite small (c.500 acres) - not much bigger than Regent's Park, in fact. -- Paul Terry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Javelin in unfamiliar places | London Transport | |||
Scotland - England: West side or east side? And who's advsing the Scots? | London Transport | |||
Scotland - England: West side or east side? And who's advsing the Scots? | London Transport | |||
South Side of Vauxhall Bridge | London Transport | |||
District Line tunnel visible in building site on north side of Victoria Street | London Transport |