On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Mizter T wrote:

And looking at it from a wider perspective, I'd think the only way it's
at all remotely feasible to even begin contemplate pedestrianising
Oxford Street on a permanent basis would be if there was a tram that
passed down its length (or, I suppose, a - shock horror - uber frequent
bendy bus type shuttle arrangement, could even be a trolley bus).

Even that would be tricky - any vehicles going down the road will diminish
its availability to pedestrians. Even pushbikes.

What we need is some sort of aerial contraption that moves people around
at a separated, higher, grade - an elevated railway, a monorail, a
cablecar, spare T5 pod-u-likes, something like that.

The knock-on consequences of banishing all buses from Oxford Street
would be immense though.

I haven't heard of a serious analysis of how much of that traffic could be
diverted along the A5204, with and without improving works on it and so
on.

tom

--
I think it would be a good idea -- Mohandas Gandhi, on Western
civilisation

Tom Anderson wrote in
rth.li:

What we need is some sort of aerial contraption that moves people
around at a separated, higher, grade - an elevated railway, a
monorail, a cablecar, spare T5 pod-u-likes, something like that.

Or what about a lower level? You could have some sort of subterranean
contraption with stops at, say, Marble Arch, Bond Street, Oxford Circus and
Tottenham Court Road.

Peter

--
| Peter Campbell Smith | Epsom | UK |

Peter Campbell Smith wrote:
Tom Anderson wrote in
arth.li:

What we need is some sort of aerial contraption that moves people
around at a separated, higher, grade - an elevated railway, a
monorail, a cablecar, spare T5 pod-u-likes, something like that.

Or what about a lower level? You could have some sort of subterranean
contraption with stops at, say, Marble Arch, Bond Street, Oxford Circus and
Tottenham Court Road.


That's a very good idea, but the very high cost of a tunnelled
solution in these straitened times would make people angry.

I suppose we could call it "Cross Rail"?

"Bruce" wrote in message
...

That's a very good idea, but the very high cost of a tunnelled
solution in these straitened times would make people angry.

I suppose we could call it "Cross Rail"?

Not 'Totally Pi$$ed Off Rail' then, I imagine that must be reserved for
HS2...

Paul