Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31/10/2011 05:24, Neil Williams wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 20:51:26 +0000, Nightjar wrote: People breaking the law cannot expect traffic signs to be adapted to suit their particular illegal actions. Amber doesn't just mean stop, as if it did we would be the same as everywhere else and go straight to green. There is a fairly good case for us doing just that these days. The red and amber sequence had some merit in the days when everyone put the vehicle in neutral and applied the handbrake when stopped at lights, but it it is increasingly irrelevant to modern driving and removing it could reduce accidents caused by drivers starting off before the green. It's a warning that something is about to happen (green) and it'd be better if drivers knew what they were getting ready for. The temporary signs at the junction seem to answer that need adequately. Colin Bignell |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
South West Trains platform signage. | London Transport | |||
Stratford Signage, National Rail -- DLR platforms | London Transport | |||
New London taxi signage with roundel | London Transport | |||
Signage for Bakerloo southern extension | London Transport | |||
Bombings - Problem Reaction Solution Paradigm | London Transport |