Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#721
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster(and Octopus?)
John Levine wrote:
Someone who seems to have reading comprehension issues said: John can never resist making an ad hominem attack. |
#722
|
|||
|
|||
cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
Robert Bonomi wrote:
Adam H. Kerman wrote: Stephen Sprunk wrote: There is no way for the terminal to know whether the Visa/MC/etc. number presented is a credit, debit or charge card. A card processor _may_ be able to deduce it from other information, but only the issuing bank knows for sure. I have no idea how you come up with this stuff, but the type of card, not to mention who issued it, is built into the number range itself. Adam 'knows not that of which he speaks'. Steven is correct. . . . While your story is lovely, the spectre Stephen raised was about gift cards, not debit cards generally. The Visa list posted by the OP has an identifiable range for gift cars. |
#723
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
In message , at 19:35:20 on Fri, 2 Mar
2012, John Levine remarked: They have gift cards, but only mag stripe, and neither visibly numbered nor containing a chip-and-pin. The latter is going to raise the bar, for gift cards masquerading as credit/debit cards, in the UK. Perhaps you would enjoy a Travelex Cash Passport, a chip+pin reloadable prepaid card. They're denominated in EUR or GBP but sold only in the U.S. The advertising emphasizes the acceptance problems that non-chip cards can have in Europe. The card is "free" but the only way to load money into it is to exchange USD at a dreadful exchange rate. http://www.travelex.com/US/Products/Cash-Passport/ Travelex tried to palm one of those off when I asked for Australian dollars, but that entirely misses the point for Brits who already have C&P cards - when travelling abroad I need some *cash*, if an ATM's accessible I could use an existing card. -- Roland Perry |
#724
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
In message , at 15:14:16 on Fri, 2 Mar 2012,
Stephen Sprunk remarked: The train companies already don't accept Solo and Electron[1], because they (the train companies) don't have online verification, so they'd just add those sorts of cards to that list. [1] Debit cards for accounts with no overdraft facilities and/or impoverished customers, like students, and under-18's. The same problem could be had with an near-/over-limit credit card, whereas one of those evil debit cards could have plenty of funds available. It seems a rather arbitrary distinction. The difference is that someone with a credit card has been shown to be eligible for credit *at all*. All you are doing is allowing a slightly elastic limit. The debit cards are for people who don't qualify for credit, either because of their age or their history. -- Roland Perry |
#725
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
In message , at 15:27:42 on Fri, 2 Mar 2012,
Stephen Sprunk remarked: This Web page discusses payment methods that also apply to paying on train: http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/times_...t_methods.html Credit/Debit/Charge Cards All National Rail train companies accept the major cards such as Visa, Visa Delta, MasterCard, Maestro and Amex. Some train companies also accept Diners Club International, Solo and Electron. Nothing on this page says that gift cards are accepted. Gosh. They must know the card number ranges! Why would they care if it's a gift card? A card is a card; as long as the transaction is authorized, that's all that matters. That's the big "if". There are many ticket vending machines, and portable machines, which are simply not "online", so they can't authorise at all. -- Roland Perry |
#726
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
Roland Perry wrote:
at 15:27:42 on Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Stephen Sprunk remarked: This Web page discusses payment methods that also apply to paying on train: http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/times_...t_methods.html Credit/Debit/Charge Cards All National Rail train companies accept the major cards such as Visa, Visa Delta, MasterCard, Maestro and Amex. Some train companies also accept Diners Club International, Solo and Electron. Nothing on this page says that gift cards are accepted. Gosh. They must know the card number ranges! Why would they care if it's a gift card? A card is a card; as long as the transaction is authorized, that's all that matters. That's the big "if". There are many ticket vending machines, and portable machines, which are simply not "online", so they can't authorise at all. That was Stephen's point to begin with, when he raised the spectre of use of gift cards that cannot be authorized in such circumstances, that cannot be debited to pay the fare. Suddenly, he's changing his position. |
#727
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster(and Octopus?)
On 03-Mar-12 02:45, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:14:16 on Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Stephen Sprunk remarked: The train companies already don't accept Solo and Electron[1], because they (the train companies) don't have online verification, so they'd just add those sorts of cards to that list. [1] Debit cards for accounts with no overdraft facilities and/or impoverished customers, like students, and under-18's. The same problem could be had with an near-/over-limit credit card, whereas one of those evil debit cards could have plenty of funds available. It seems a rather arbitrary distinction. The difference is that someone with a credit card has been shown to be eligible for credit *at all*. All you are doing is allowing a slightly elastic limit. The debit cards are for people who don't qualify for credit, either because of their age or their history. Pretty much everyone qualifies for a credit card, at least in the US. Those with poor credit scores get a low limit and high interest rate, but they can still get a card. If nothing else, they can get a "secured" credit card. (That type of card may be unique to the US.) IMHO, in most* cases using credit shows fiscal irresponsibility because the person is spending money they do not have. If anything, I would be more likely to trust a _debit_ card user. (* My personal rule is that one should never be paying for something after one has finished using it. So, credit only makes sense for things like education, housing, durable goods, etc. Not for train tickets, certainly.) Note that "credit" in the US generally means _revolving_ credit; if you are referring to "charge" cards that have to be paid in full every month, that is a different matter. However, charge cards are rare in the US; even AmEx, the best-known charge card brand, now offers revolving cards to profit from Americans' irresponsibility. S -- Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking |
#728
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster(and Octopus?)
On 03-Mar-12 02:46, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:27:42 on Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Stephen Sprunk remarked: This Web page discusses payment methods that also apply to paying on train: http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/times_...t_methods.html Credit/Debit/Charge Cards All National Rail train companies accept the major cards such as Visa, Visa Delta, MasterCard, Maestro and Amex. Some train companies also accept Diners Club International, Solo and Electron. Nothing on this page says that gift cards are accepted. Gosh. They must know the card number ranges! Why would they care if it's a gift card? A card is a card; as long as the transaction is authorized, that's all that matters. That's the big "if". There are many ticket vending machines, and portable machines, which are simply not "online", so they can't authorise at all. Then the merchant is taking a risk on each transaction, regardless of the card type. Given the cheap and ubiquitous mobile data networks, there is no excuse for not being able to do online authorization. (If the rail network has spotty signal coverage, this will help motivate them to fix that, which also results in better service for customers and therefore the ability to increase fares.) S -- Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking |
#729
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
In message , at 14:45:38 on Sat, 3 Mar 2012,
Stephen Sprunk remarked: Pretty much everyone qualifies for a credit card, at least in the US. Those with poor credit scores get a low limit and high interest rate, but they can still get a card. If nothing else, they can get a "secured" credit card. (That type of card may be unique to the US.) Last time I looked into this, about half the UK's adult population is regarded as "not credit worthy". Although it's easier to get store credit, mail order catalogue credit, and "Hire purchase credit" for durable items, than a credit card for general use. IMHO, in most* cases using credit shows fiscal irresponsibility because the person is spending money they do not have. If anything, I would be more likely to trust a _debit_ card user. The problem with the (former) holders of Solo/Electron cards is that often they are minor and therefore pursuing debts against them is tricky. So they need a bank account and debit card which cannot go overdrawn. In the UK we don't usually have parents co-signing in such circumstance, other than perhaps for the rental of a property for a student. Then there are the folks whose bank won't allow them an overdraft because they haven't been shown to be fiscally responsible. As a result, there's an aura of literally "poor man's card" hanging over all debit cards. A lot of credit card holders use them in effect as charge cards, as a substitute for the "monthly credit" that the middle classes used to get from tradesmen. -- Roland Perry |
#730
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
In message , at 14:49:32 on Sat, 3 Mar 2012,
Stephen Sprunk remarked: Why would they care if it's a gift card? A card is a card; as long as the transaction is authorized, that's all that matters. That's the big "if". There are many ticket vending machines, and portable machines, which are simply not "online", so they can't authorise at all. Then the merchant is taking a risk on each transaction, regardless of the card type. There's always a small risk, and sometimes the ticket vendor will make a [mobile] phone call if a particular cardholder raises suspicions. But as we don't have these faux-credit-card gift cards here, and people with credit cards and bank accounts that allow overdrafts usually do pay these off, the only class where there's a serious worry is the no-overdraft debit card holders. Given the cheap and ubiquitous mobile data networks, there is no excuse for not being able to do online authorization. They aren't cheap and ubiquitous enough. In particular, the equipment would need replacing (not just simple upgrading). I don't believe data networks are ubiquitous in the USA either, if the very spotty mobile phone coverage more than a few miles from major cities and highways is anything to go by. -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|