London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 4th 12, 10:13 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2005
Posts: 392
Default M25 widening proposal

I've just found http://www.highways.gov.uk/news/pressrelease.aspx?press
releaseid=425156

Construction of an M25 managed motorway scheme for junctions 5
(Sevenoaks) and 7 (M23) is proposed to start in 2013/14.

The press release says it will be the "first M25 'managed motorway'".
I don't know why the scheme between M3 & M4 does not qualify already.

"The hard shoulder will be converted to a traffic lane to add extra
capacity. Variable mandatory speed limits, displayed on overhead and
verge-mounted signs will help smooth the flow of traffic and reduce
congestion on this busy section of motorway."

The M25 often seizes in the AM peak between J5 & Clacket Lane Services.
--
Walter Briscoe

  #2   Report Post  
Old August 4th 12, 11:10 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Mar 2009
Posts: 664
Default M25 widening proposal

Walter Briscoe wrote on 04 August 2012
11:13:21 ...
I've just found http://www.highways.gov.uk/news/pressrelease.aspx?press
releaseid=425156

Construction of an M25 managed motorway scheme for junctions 5
(Sevenoaks) and 7 (M23) is proposed to start in 2013/14.

The press release says it will be the "first M25 'managed motorway'".
I don't know why the scheme between M3 & M4 does not qualify already.


The term "managed motorway" means that the hard shoulder is available as
a traffic lane. The variable limit schemes on the M25 don't currently
include that.

"The hard shoulder will be converted to a traffic lane to add extra
capacity. Variable mandatory speed limits, displayed on overhead and
verge-mounted signs will help smooth the flow of traffic and reduce
congestion on this busy section of motorway."

The M25 often seizes in the AM peak between J5 & Clacket Lane Services.


--
Richard J.
(to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address)
  #3   Report Post  
Old August 4th 12, 11:11 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,008
Default M25 widening proposal

On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 11:13:21 +0100, Walter Briscoe
wrote:

I've just found http://www.highways.gov.uk/news/pressrelease.aspx?press
releaseid=425156

Construction of an M25 managed motorway scheme for junctions 5
(Sevenoaks) and 7 (M23) is proposed to start in 2013/14.

The press release says it will be the "first M25 'managed motorway'".
I don't know why the scheme between M3 & M4 does not qualify already.

"The hard shoulder will be converted to a traffic lane to add extra
capacity. Variable mandatory speed limits, displayed on overhead and
verge-mounted signs will help smooth the flow of traffic and reduce
congestion on this busy section of motorway."

The M25 often seizes in the AM peak between J5 & Clacket Lane Services.


Presumably the part-time use of the hard shoulder is what makes it a
managed motorway?
  #4   Report Post  
Old August 4th 12, 11:12 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2010
Posts: 23
Default M25 widening proposal

On 04/08/2012 11:13, Walter Briscoe wrote:
I've just found http://www.highways.gov.uk/news/pressrelease.aspx?press
releaseid=425156

Construction of an M25 managed motorway scheme for junctions 5
(Sevenoaks) and 7 (M23) is proposed to start in 2013/14.

The press release says it will be the "first M25 'managed motorway'".
I don't know why the scheme between M3 & M4 does not qualify already.

"The hard shoulder will be converted to a traffic lane to add extra
capacity. Variable mandatory speed limits, displayed on overhead and
verge-mounted signs will help smooth the flow of traffic and reduce
congestion on this busy section of motorway."

The M25 often seizes in the AM peak between J5 & Clacket Lane Services.

It doesn't apply to the section from J10(A3) to J16(M4) because that
just has variable speed restrictions on the existing carriageway 3 or 4
lanes as appropriate. What they are talking baout here is using the hard
shoulder as an extra lane under certain conditions. They will need to
build extra refuges so that vehicles can pull right off th e road if
needed, put up lots of variable signs, and probaly lots more CCTV. I
just wish they'd do something between J10 and J12 which always grinds to
a halt for no real apparent reason.

Kevin
  #5   Report Post  
Old August 4th 12, 12:38 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 141
Default M25 widening proposal

On Aug 4, 11:13*am, Walter Briscoe
wrote:
Variable mandatory speed limits, displayed on overhead ...


Aren't all existing motorway limits 'mandatory'? They are not, in
general, enforced particularly well.

PhilD

--



  #6   Report Post  
Old August 4th 12, 01:19 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 836
Default M25 widening proposal

"Kevin Ayton" wrote in message ...

On 04/08/2012 11:13, Walter Briscoe wrote:
I've just found http://www.highways.gov.uk/news/pressrelease.aspx?press
releaseid=425156

Construction of an M25 managed motorway scheme for junctions 5
(Sevenoaks) and 7 (M23) is proposed to start in 2013/14.

The press release says it will be the "first M25 'managed motorway'".
I don't know why the scheme between M3 & M4 does not qualify already.

"The hard shoulder will be converted to a traffic lane to add extra
capacity. Variable mandatory speed limits, displayed on overhead and
verge-mounted signs will help smooth the flow of traffic and reduce
congestion on this busy section of motorway."

The M25 often seizes in the AM peak between J5 & Clacket Lane Services.

It doesn't apply to the section from J10(A3) to J16(M4) because that
just has variable speed restrictions on the existing carriageway 3 or 4
lanes as appropriate. What they are talking baout here is using the hard
shoulder as an extra lane under certain conditions. They will need to
build extra refuges so that vehicles can pull right off th e road if
needed, put up lots of variable signs, and probaly lots more CCTV. I
just wish they'd do something between J10 and J12 which always grinds to
a halt for no real apparent reason.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is already a section around Brum that does that. Part of the M42
IIRC, I drove on it last week,

tim


  #7   Report Post  
Old August 4th 12, 01:20 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Mar 2009
Posts: 664
Default M25 widening proposal

PhilD wrote on 04 August 2012 13:38:28 ...
On Aug 4, 11:13 am, Walter Briscoe
wrote:
Variable mandatory speed limits, displayed on overhead ...


Aren't all existing motorway limits 'mandatory'? They are not, in
general, enforced particularly well.

PhilD


The limits with the number inside a red circle are mandatory. If the
number is shown accompanied by amber flashing lights and no circle, it's
an advisory limit.
--
Richard J.
(to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address)
  #8   Report Post  
Old August 4th 12, 02:03 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,008
Default M25 widening proposal

On Sat, 4 Aug 2012 14:19:06 +0100, "tim....."
wrote:

There is already a section around Brum that does that. Part of the M42
IIRC, I drove on it last week,


That was the original pilot scheme from 2006, which was deemed to be
very successful, so the idea is being rolled out more widely. It's
already operational on the M6, with the M1 under construction and many
more to come.
See http://www.highways.gov.uk/news/25754.aspx
  #9   Report Post  
Old August 4th 12, 02:18 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2003
Posts: 351
Default M25 widening proposal

In article ,
Richard J. wrote:
PhilD wrote on 04 August 2012 13:38:28 ...
On Aug 4, 11:13 am, Walter Briscoe
wrote:
Variable mandatory speed limits, displayed on overhead ...


Aren't all existing motorway limits 'mandatory'? They are not, in
general, enforced particularly well.

PhilD


The limits with the number inside a red circle are mandatory.


And enforced by speed cameras linked to the changing limit on every
second or third gantry (less often on the M42 stretch I think but it
has quite closely spaced signs). Once you know what to look for, you
can see the camera fitted ones as you approach them.

Nick
--
"The Internet, a sort of ersatz counterfeit of real life"
-- Janet Street-Porter, BBC2, 19th March 1996
  #10   Report Post  
Old August 4th 12, 03:13 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default M25 widening proposal

In message
, at
05:38:28 on Sat, 4 Aug 2012, PhilD remarked:
Variable mandatory speed limits, displayed on overhead ...


Aren't all existing motorway limits 'mandatory'? They are not, in
general, enforced particularly well.


It's often said that the ones on rectangular signs in the central
reservation are merely advisory.
--
Roland Perry


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Blackfriars Bridge widening Paul Scott London Transport 20 April 8th 10 02:13 PM
Stratford platform widening Tim Roll-Pickering London Transport 2 September 3rd 07 07:25 PM
I searching personage lives near motorway west M25 south M25 Leon London Transport 1 May 10th 05 05:31 PM
West London Tram Proposal Stephen Richards London Transport 28 September 9th 04 02:01 PM
Crossrail 3 proposal (long) Nitro London Transport 34 May 3rd 04 10:48 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017