![]() |
Proposal - every Tube ticket office to close by 2015
Aurora wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:08:44 -0600, wrote: In article , (David Cantrell) wrote: On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 05:55:11PM +0000, d wrote: He's probably one of those people who thinks because HE never needs a particular service, no one else ever will either. And for people like my blind mother, there will still be staff available to help her buy a ticket. I say good riddance to ticket offices, despite my own mother not being able to use the machines, provided that they still provide some way of dealing with Oyster errors at stations. You mean they introduce ways of dealing with Oyster errors at stations? Most problems I ever have they (including ticket office staff) say "ring the helpline". The outlying stations are of greater concern than the inner tube, and sub-surface, stations. There needs to be a manned passimeter, and someone watching the gate line, platforms etc. TfL should also consider encouraging newsstands and cafes. A manned passimeter? Not for the last few decades, the there hasn't! And it's rare to have a manned presence on the platforms on quieter stations. If TfL need to save money they would do better to look at more unmanned trains. Is there room for productivity increases? They won't have less than one member of staff on a train, so no savings there. |
Proposal - every Tube ticket office to close by 2015
They won't have less than one member of staff on a train, so no savings
there. Hmmn. What does the Paris Metro know that TfL doesn't? -- Regards, John Levine, , Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly |
Proposal - every Tube ticket office to close by 2015
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 19:44:35 on Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Phil remarked: In most other countries I expect they would be unavailable and it would just be a "tourist tax". Or a city tax would be charged on hotel rooms and a free ticket issued for everyone staying. I wonder if, say, a £3 per day flat-rate fee on hotel rooms and give everyone a free Z1-2 travelcard would do the trick - not everyone will use it but it solves the problem for the rest. You are assuming everyone staying in a hotel is an occasional tourist. Many are regular visitors who, like me, already have an oyster card and stay overnight after a concert or a show. They will not take kindly to having to pay again for public transport. And in another place: "The 24-hour tube will boost weekend departures from Heathrow and hit companies selling holiday 'add-ons', claims an operator. Proposals for a 24-hour Tube service on Friday and Saturday nights from 2015 was announced by Transport for London last month. But loveholidays.com claims 'extras' like airport parking or overnight hotels are likely to suffer, as demand will drop. Rubbish The average person who uses service like that has to make a journey much longer than is possible on the underground If your destination is Milton Keynes, for example, it's no good that you can get to Euston if there aren't any onward trains tim It also believes that Heathrow will become the preferred airport for passengers, as it is the only London/South East airport on a Tube line. Al Francis from loveholidays.com says: "People will be more willing to take flights at 'unsociable' times because the 24-hour Tube service will mean it will be easier to get across London to and from the airport. "The losers will be 'holiday extras'. With a 24-hour Tube service, people are less likely to need airport parking or book an airport hotel." -- Roland Perry |
Proposal - every Tube ticket office to close by 2015
"Recliner" wrote in message ... Aurora wrote: On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 09:08:44 -0600, wrote: In article , (David Cantrell) wrote: On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 05:55:11PM +0000, d wrote: He's probably one of those people who thinks because HE never needs a particular service, no one else ever will either. And for people like my blind mother, there will still be staff available to help her buy a ticket. I say good riddance to ticket offices, despite my own mother not being able to use the machines, provided that they still provide some way of dealing with Oyster errors at stations. You mean they introduce ways of dealing with Oyster errors at stations? Most problems I ever have they (including ticket office staff) say "ring the helpline". The outlying stations are of greater concern than the inner tube, and sub-surface, stations. There needs to be a manned passimeter, and someone watching the gate line, platforms etc. TfL should also consider encouraging newsstands and cafes. A manned passimeter? Not for the last few decades, the there hasn't! And it's rare to have a manned presence on the platforms on quieter stations. If TfL need to save money they would do better to look at more unmanned trains. Is there room for productivity increases? They won't have less than one member of staff on a train, so no savings there. why not Other automated lines do (or don't whichever way you look at it!) tim |
Proposal - every Tube ticket office to close by 2015
In message , at 18:39:48 on Tue, 3 Dec
2013, tim...... remarked: And in another place: "The 24-hour tube will boost weekend departures from Heathrow and hit companies selling holiday 'add-ons', claims an operator. Proposals for a 24-hour Tube service on Friday and Saturday nights from 2015 was announced by Transport for London last month. But loveholidays.com claims 'extras' like airport parking or overnight hotels are likely to suffer, as demand will drop. Rubbish Many such shroud-waving claims are best treated with extreme suspicion. The average person who uses service like that has to make a journey much longer than is possible on the underground If your destination is Milton Keynes, for example, it's no good that you can get to Euston if there aren't any onward trains Although just losing trade from people living inside the Tube area would have some sort of impact. -- Roland Perry |
Proposal - every Tube ticket office to close by 2015
On Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:41:18 +0100
"tim......" wrote: They won't have less than one member of staff on a train, so no savings there. why not Other automated lines do (or don't whichever way you look at it!) Good luck trying to evacuate a stranded tube train with no staff on board. Fully automated metro systems - and the DLR - ALL have walkways in the tunnels alongside the track so the doors can be opened remotely and the passengers can just walk to the nearest station. Try doing that with the 6 inch gap between the doors and the tunnel walls on the deep level tube lines. Oh, and there's a 4th rail in the middle of the track so its bloody tricky to walk along without getting electrocuted if someone hasn't switched the power off. -- Spud |
Proposal - every Tube ticket office to close by 2015
wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:41:18 +0100 "tim......" wrote: They won't have less than one member of staff on a train, so no savings there. why not Other automated lines do (or don't whichever way you look at it!) Good luck trying to evacuate a stranded tube train with no staff on board. Fully automated metro systems - and the DLR - ALL have walkways in the tunnels alongside the track so the doors can be opened remotely and the passengers can just walk to the nearest station. Try doing that with the 6 inch gap between the doors and the tunnel walls on the deep level tube lines. Oh, and there's a 4th rail in the middle of the track so its bloody tricky to walk along without getting electrocuted if someone hasn't switched the power off. All true, and DLR trains aren't unmanned or fully automated anyway. The operator still closes the doors, after looking down the platform. |
Proposal - every Tube ticket office to close by 2015
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:13:38 -0600, Recliner
wrote: wrote: On Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:41:18 +0100 "tim......" wrote: They won't have less than one member of staff on a train, so no savings there. why not Other automated lines do (or don't whichever way you look at it!) Good luck trying to evacuate a stranded tube train with no staff on board. Fully automated metro systems - and the DLR - ALL have walkways in the tunnels alongside the track so the doors can be opened remotely and the passengers can just walk to the nearest station. Try doing that with the 6 inch gap between the doors and the tunnel walls on the deep level tube lines. Oh, and there's a 4th rail in the middle of the track so its bloody tricky to walk along without getting electrocuted if someone hasn't switched the power off. All true, and DLR trains aren't unmanned or fully automated anyway. The operator still closes the doors, after looking down the platform. And in practice becomes a driver when things go tits-up. |
Proposal - every Tube ticket office to close by 2015
John Levine wrote:
They won't have less than one member of staff on a train, so no savings there. Hmmn. What does the Paris Metro know that TfL doesn't? How to build tunnels with walkways? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk