London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 27th 15, 05:14 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,385
Default Crossrail 2 crayonista attack


Some more crayonista stuff.

The line planned from the new Stoke Newington junction to New
Southgate... instead of
(Seven Sisters, Wood Green) or
(Seven Sisters, Turnpike Lane, Alexandra Palace) how about
(Harringay Green Lanes, Crouch End Broadway, Muswell Hill Broadway)
instead. In distance terms it would be marginally longer, but it serves
a lot more places that are very poorly served at the moment. If
interchange with the Seven Sisters Overground is essential, add a pair
of platforms at Stoke Newington immediately south of the junction.

It would miss out on interchange with the Picc and Vic, but I don't see
that as a major problem because the line largely replicates the Vic
anyway. Alternatively, run it from Dalston via (Finsbury Park, Crouch
Hill, Crouch End Broadway, Muswell Hill Broadway) and possibly give the
Seven Sisters Overground line a Stoke Newington interchange with the
Tottenham Hale Crossrail branch. But that would all be dearer, I think.
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 27th 15, 05:10 PM
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2011
Location: Leyton, East London
Posts: 902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Basil Jet[_4_] View Post
Some more crayonista stuff.

The line planned from the new Stoke Newington junction to New
Southgate... instead of
(Seven Sisters, Wood Green) or
(Seven Sisters, Turnpike Lane, Alexandra Palace) how about
(Harringay Green Lanes, Crouch End Broadway, Muswell Hill Broadway)
instead. In distance terms it would be marginally longer, but it serves
a lot more places that are very poorly served at the moment. If
interchange with the Seven Sisters Overground is essential, add a pair
of platforms at Stoke Newington immediately south of the junction.

It would miss out on interchange with the Picc and Vic, but I don't see
that as a major problem because the line largely replicates the Vic
anyway. Alternatively, run it from Dalston via (Finsbury Park, Crouch
Hill, Crouch End Broadway, Muswell Hill Broadway) and possibly give the
Seven Sisters Overground line a Stoke Newington interchange with the
Tottenham Hale Crossrail branch. But that would all be dearer, I think.
If you're taking your line to Muswell Hill - splendid idea,
by the way - you might as well take it further to New
Southgate and Arnos Grove, this providing links to two
other lines.
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 27th 15, 09:09 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,385
Default Crossrail 2 crayonista attack

On 2015\11\27 18:10, Robin9 wrote:
'Basil Jet[_4_ Wrote:
;152066']Some more crayonista stuff.

The line planned from the new Stoke Newington junction to New
Southgate... instead of
(Seven Sisters, Wood Green) or
(Seven Sisters, Turnpike Lane, Alexandra Palace) how about
(Harringay Green Lanes, Crouch End Broadway, Muswell Hill Broadway)
instead. In distance terms it would be marginally longer, but it serves

a lot more places that are very poorly served at the moment. If
interchange with the Seven Sisters Overground is essential, add a pair
of platforms at Stoke Newington immediately south of the junction.

It would miss out on interchange with the Picc and Vic, but I don't see

that as a major problem because the line largely replicates the Vic
anyway. Alternatively, run it from Dalston via (Finsbury Park, Crouch
Hill, Crouch End Broadway, Muswell Hill Broadway) and possibly give the

Seven Sisters Overground line a Stoke Newington interchange with the
Tottenham Hale Crossrail branch. But that would all be dearer, I think.


If you're taking your line to Muswell Hill - splendid idea,
by the way - you might as well take it further to New
Southgate and Arnos Grove, this providing links to two
other lines.


Thanks for being the only person to reply... fantasy railways used to be
very popular in this group... not so much now, it would seem. Mostly
that's a good thing, but Crossrail 2 is something we might really change.

I wasn't very clear, but I was taking it as given that New Southgate
would be the terminus and depot regardless of route chosen.

I'm thinking of emailing the Hornsey MP. I prefer the Finsbury Park
option but I think it's a lot dearer, and I'm reluctant to advocate
increased cost because then it does become fantasy railway. But I'm not
sure if Muswell Hill / Crouch End residents would want a railway...
before you know it you'd have St Georges flags hanging from windows and
white vans covered in Ukip stickers.
  #4   Report Post  
Old November 28th 15, 02:25 PM
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2011
Location: Leyton, East London
Posts: 902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Basil Jet[_4_] View Post
On 2015\11\27 18:10, Robin9 wrote:
'Basil Jet[_4_ Wrote:
;152066']Some more crayonista stuff.

The line planned from the new Stoke Newington junction to New
Southgate... instead of
(Seven Sisters, Wood Green) or
(Seven Sisters, Turnpike Lane, Alexandra Palace) how about
(Harringay Green Lanes, Crouch End Broadway, Muswell Hill Broadway)
instead. In distance terms it would be marginally longer, but it serves

a lot more places that are very poorly served at the moment. If
interchange with the Seven Sisters Overground is essential, add a pair
of platforms at Stoke Newington immediately south of the junction.

It would miss out on interchange with the Picc and Vic, but I don't see

that as a major problem because the line largely replicates the Vic
anyway. Alternatively, run it from Dalston via (Finsbury Park, Crouch
Hill, Crouch End Broadway, Muswell Hill Broadway) and possibly give the

Seven Sisters Overground line a Stoke Newington interchange with the
Tottenham Hale Crossrail branch. But that would all be dearer, I think.


If you're taking your line to Muswell Hill - splendid idea,
by the way - you might as well take it further to New
Southgate and Arnos Grove, this providing links to two
other lines.


Thanks for being the only person to reply... fantasy railways used to be
very popular in this group... not so much now, it would seem. Mostly
that's a good thing, but Crossrail 2 is something we might really change.

I wasn't very clear, but I was taking it as given that New Southgate
would be the terminus and depot regardless of route chosen.

I'm thinking of emailing the Hornsey MP. I prefer the Finsbury Park
option but I think it's a lot dearer, and I'm reluctant to advocate
increased cost because then it does become fantasy railway. But I'm not
sure if Muswell Hill / Crouch End residents would want a railway...
before you know it you'd have St Georges flags hanging from windows and
white vans covered in Ukip stickers.
The more I think about it, the more convinced I am
that Crossrail 2 needs to be changed.

I know a few people in the Muswell Hill area and only a
few are like those nimbys in Chelsea. I think many would
appreciate their own station. I sometimes travel home from
Colney Hatch Lane by taking the 43 bus to Upper Holloway
Station and then by Overground. It's slow and a station at
Muswell Hill would speed things up.

In St James Lane in Muswell Hill, the old viaduct to Alexander
Palace in still in place, reminding us of Muswell Hill's previous
railway connection.
  #5   Report Post  
Old November 28th 15, 03:08 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,385
Default Crossrail 2 crayonista attack

On 2015\11\28 15:25, Robin9 wrote:
The more I think about it, the more convinced I am
that Crossrail 2 needs to be changed.

I know a few people in the Muswell Hill area and only a
few are like those nimbys in Chelsea. I think many would
appreciate their own station. I sometimes travel home from
Colney Hatch Lane by taking the 43 bus to Upper Holloway
Station and then by Overground. It's slow and a station at
Muswell Hill would speed things up.


The other factor is that people in Albert Road and Tottenham Lane who
currently bus to Picc stations would start using the stations at Muswell
Hill and Crouch End instead, so it would still provide some relief to
the Picc, which I believe is one of its stated aims (although presumably
not as much as an interchange at Wood Green or Turnpike Lane would).


  #6   Report Post  
Old November 28th 15, 03:11 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2015
Posts: 79
Default Crossrail 2 crayonista attack

In message , Robin9
writes

In St James Lane in Muswell Hill, the old viaduct to Alexander
Palace in still in place, reminding us of Muswell Hill's previous
railway connection.


In the 80s, as a Haringey Councillor, I supported a light railway of , a
then unique, design running partly on rails partly suspended, funded by
the EU and which would have run from Highgate (upper level) station
along, above the abandoned line through Muswell Hill, Crouch End,
Alexandra Palace to Finsbury Park.

The idea was abandoned as the environmentalists amongst us didn't want
to build on what had become the Parkland Walk
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkland_Walk )



--
Bryan Morris
Public Key http://www.pgp.uk.demon.net - 0xCC6237E9
  #7   Report Post  
Old November 28th 15, 03:38 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,385
Default Crossrail 2 crayonista attack

On 2015\11\28 16:11, Bryan Morris wrote:
In message , Robin9
writes

In St James Lane in Muswell Hill, the old viaduct to Alexander
Palace in still in place, reminding us of Muswell Hill's previous
railway connection.


In the 80s, as a Haringey Councillor, I supported a light railway of , a
then unique, design running partly on rails partly suspended, funded by
the EU and which would have run from Highgate (upper level) station
along, above the abandoned line through Muswell Hill, Crouch End,
Alexandra Palace to Finsbury Park.


I presume you mean from Alexandra Palace through Muswell Hill, Highgate
(upper level) station, Crouch End, to Finsbury Park, i.e. following the
abandoned railway. Suspended how? Like the Schwebebahn?

  #8   Report Post  
Old November 29th 15, 07:58 AM
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2011
Location: Leyton, East London
Posts: 902
Default

I suspect that eventually those "environmentalists" will get
a shock. As London's population grows, ever greater pressure
will be placed on transport infrastructure and politicians will cast
around for relatively cheap ways of providing new capacity.

At some stage in the next thirty years or so, London Overground
will suggest running a service from Highgate (high level) along
Parkland Walk to Finsbury Park and then via Canonbury Tunnel to
Stratford. I'm convinced it's just a matter of time.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Machete attack on Norbury train Basil Jet[_4_] London Transport 1 May 14th 17 08:42 PM
Terror attack "highly likely" Basil Jet[_2_] London Transport 0 January 7th 11 04:30 AM
Drunk passenger attack leads to strike DaveKnight London Transport 33 August 1st 08 02:56 PM
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) [email protected] London Transport 3 August 9th 04 03:06 PM
she should attack once, believe weekly, then solve alongside the candle around the shower Wail Pervis Al Afghani London Transport 0 October 9th 03 04:45 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017