Battersea extension
 

On 11-Oct-16 2:05 PM, d wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:05:59 +0100
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 06:04:41
on Tue, 11 Oct 2016, remarked:
I doubt that platform doors will be fitted. There might be passive
provision but doors on just 2 Northern Line stations doesn't look likely
to me.

I always thought they were an expensive white elephant that served little
purpose but TfL seems to like them - they're going in on crossrail -
so I wouldn't put it past them to install just on 2 stations.

The safety benefits are considerable and they may well improve dwell times.

Also improved air flow and cooling.

I fail to see how - they're only 7 foot high. If the train was completely
sealed off from the platform the sure, but it isn't. Any train heat just
wafts up and over.

--
Spud



More like 10' high.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Battersea extension
 

In article , (Roland
Perry) wrote:

I have a current police investigation ongoing.

Into your activities?

No, into the Stalker(s)

--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
Please Help us dispose of unwanted virtual currency:
Bitcoin: 1LzAJBqzoaEudhsZ14W7YrdYSmLZ5m1seZ

Battersea extension
 

In message , at 13:46:17 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, d remarked:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:28:02 +0100
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 13:10:15 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, d remarked:

My original point was I found out his home address from his usenet post
in literally 10 seconds flat.

And my point is "why do I care". Assuming it's not the address of my
accountant, of course.

Whether you care is irrelevant. Just demonstrating that perhaps before accusing
other people of ignorance of the ways of the internet you should take a look
in the mirror first.

I know perfectly well about the "ways of the Internet", which is why
this particular aspect is somewhere between "doesn't worry me" and "that
genie escaped the bottle long ago".

Also you'd have to have a pretty stupid accountant for him
to allow you to use his home address since that is clearly not solely a
business premises.

If I was "in hiding" he could be doing it as a favour.
--
Roland Perry

Battersea extension
 

In message , at 13:49:22 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, d remarked:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:30:32 +0100
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 13:07:52 on Thu, 13 Oct
Stalking doesn't "just happen". Even nutters don't pick a random person to
stalk, there's always a reason.

Precisely so. If someone wants to stalk you they'll do irregardless of
an accommodation address on your email domain.

You can't stalk someone you can't find.

Of course you can. You can stalk them at work or even drum roll over
the Internet.

And if they can't find your address or where you work then there's
really not a lot they can do other than bother you online which unless
you're a 13 year old girl or some hopeless bedwetter is an irrelevance.

They can do vastly more. Which is why knowing the address is down in the
noise level.

Is it? I'd be far more concerned with someone turning up on the doorstep with
a knife than someone sending me nasty texts or emails or finding out my CC
number and buying crap on amazon. YMMV however.

You must lead an exciting life for people to become that upset with you.
--
Roland Perry

Battersea extension
 

In message , at 17:31:43 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, tim... remarked:

electoral roll, planning permission applications[1],

do they have names on?

The former would be pretty useless without names on, and yes, the latter
do, or I wouldn't have mentioned it.
--
Roland Perry

Battersea extension
 

"Roland Perry"

electoral roll, planning permission applications[1],

do they have names on?

The former would be pretty useless without names on, and yes, the latter
do, or I wouldn't have mentioned it.


I recently discovered

Part-B-Entitlement-to-register-March-2010.pdf

Some special category electors must be entered on the register
without their qualifying address or without their name and qualifying
address. Further information on such electors can be found in Part F,
‘Special category electors’.

http://www.electoralcommission.org.u...March-2010.pdf

--
Mike D

Battersea extension
 

In message , at 21:27:39 on Fri, 14
Oct 2016, Michael R N Dolbear remarked:
electoral roll, planning permission applications[1],

do they have names on?

The former would be pretty useless without names on, and yes, the latter
do, or I wouldn't have mentioned it.


I recently discovered

Part-B-Entitlement-to-register-March-2010.pdf

Some special category electors must be entered on the register
without their qualifying address or without their name and qualifying
address. Further information on such electors can be found in Part F,
‘Special category electors’.

http://www.electoralcommission.org.u...ral_commission
_pdf_file/0011/43958/Part-F-Special-category-electors-March-2010.pdf

Yes, I'm aware of that[1] and this precaution is only available after
you've been at risk, and obviously can't be retrospective to previous
electoral rolls and those databases which have scraped them. It's very
much for the situation I mentioned earlier, of going into hiding after
your safety has been compromised.

[1] There was also some hiccup along the lines they forgot to make the
list of special category electors immune from FOI requests.

--
Roland Perry

Battersea extension
 

On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:18:39 +0100
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 13:49:22 on Thu, 13 Oct
2016, d remarked:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:30:32 +0100
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 13:07:52 on Thu, 13 Oct
Stalking doesn't "just happen". Even nutters don't pick a random person to
stalk, there's always a reason.

Precisely so. If someone wants to stalk you they'll do irregardless of
an accommodation address on your email domain.

You can't stalk someone you can't find.

Of course you can. You can stalk them at work or even drum roll over
the Internet.

How exactly do you "stalk" someone over a computer network? Send them nasty
emails and tweets? Aww, diddums. Anyone who is bothered by that needs to grow
a pair. And if you can't find someone you can't stalk them at work either can
you? And if you could find them at work you could follow them home too.

Is it? I'd be far more concerned with someone turning up on the doorstep with
a knife than someone sending me nasty texts or emails or finding out my CC
number and buying crap on amazon. YMMV however.

You must lead an exciting life for people to become that upset with you.

It seems to bother you since you're involved in stalking. Perhaps talking
from experience?

--
Spud

Battersea extension
 

In message , at 08:28:09 on Mon, 17 Oct
2016, d remarked:

You can't stalk someone you can't find.

Of course you can. You can stalk them at work or even drum roll over
the Internet.

How exactly do you "stalk" someone over a computer network? Send them nasty
emails and tweets? Aww, diddums. Anyone who is bothered by that needs to grow
a pair.

It does bother some people when they get emails like "when you get home
you'll find your cat nailed to the front door" (real example).

It is difficult to know where to draw the line, though, because
different people do react differently to various threat levels.

"You look like a ****ing mutant and should be burnt at the stake, We'll see
what you say when an immigrant rapes you or one of your kids"

(to a Remain supporter). Facebook and Twitter agree with you and say
it's perfectly acceptable to direct comments like that at people.
Although of course that's trolling rather than stalking.

And if you can't find someone you can't stalk them at work either can
you? And if you could find them at work you could follow them home too.

It's not necessarily the case that every work stalker follows the victim
home.

Is it? I'd be far more concerned with someone turning up on the doorstep with
a knife than someone sending me nasty texts or emails or finding out my CC
number and buying crap on amazon. YMMV however.

You must lead an exciting life for people to become that upset with you.

It seems to bother you since you're involved in stalking. Perhaps talking
from experience?

Oddly, we are one of the few organisations working in the subject who
are neither ex-law enforcement or ex-victims (nor of course
perpetrators). We think this gives us added objectivity.
--
Roland Perry

Battersea extension
 

On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:24:45 +0100
Roland Perry wrote:
Although of course that's trolling rather than stalking.

Quite.

And if you can't find someone you can't stalk them at work either can
you? And if you could find them at work you could follow them home too.

It's not necessarily the case that every work stalker follows the victim
home.

You'd expect that as the obvious escalation though.

--
Spud