| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
February 9th 17, 09:48 AM
posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak -Barking improvements
Roland Perry wrote:
In message -septe mber.org, at 09:20:11 on Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Recliner remarked: http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co...-further-work- is-required http://www.barking-gospeloak.org.uk/...ss_release.pdf It looks like NR is trying to pass the blame on to the contractors: "Along the 14-mile route, a number of the structures, which carry the overhead lines, were incorrectly designed and couldn’t be installed at the planned locations. Late delivery of materials and structures also led to further delays." I think NR would have used different words if the faults had been its own. NR's fault is (once again) lack of project management and performing checks on what was being designed/manufactured. Yup |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak - | London Transport | |||
| Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak - | London Transport | |||
| Gospel Oak-Barking | London Transport | |||
| SPECS installation in Gospel Oak? | London Transport | |||
| Gospel Oak - Barking | London Transport | |||
![Recliner[_3_] is offline](https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Threaded Mode
