Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 May 2017 21:14:01 +0100
Graeme Wall wrote: On 22/05/2017 16:51, d wrote: of the many heathrow flight paths and there's enough air traffic already. God knows what it'll be like with even more. Assuming NATs can handle it which isn't a given as it seems from 2019 they'll be doing London Citys remote control tower - no one at home, just video feeds down a presumably "secure" link. What could possibly go wrong? Actually three separate secure links. And how do you know the current one in use hasn't been compromised and is feeding duff data or video? Or failing that a contractor cuts through the cables by mistake. I utterly fail to see the logic behind this. It must be costing a fortune to do and for what? They won't be saving on salaries since they'll still need new people at NATs so what is the reason? Heating bill of the control tower? Given the risks its an absurd decision. -- Spud |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DLR Canning Town Stratford International - still not opened ... | London Transport | |||
DLR strike off - Tube Lines infraco strike still on, but Tubeservices will still run | London Transport | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Access to Heathrow this weekend and next | London Transport |