| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
June 23rd 04, 12:42 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
London Underground "Extension" Walls
"Laura-Ann" wrote in message news  Thanks for the replies  Guess it would make sense. Well, maybe not make sense for them not to remove/repaint the walls - I'm sure they have some really great excuse for that. Is it not part of the JLE then anymore? Why paint over something that isn't graffiti and is still technically correct? Perhaps there are more pressing needs to be address, like crumbling walls or offensive graffiti? |
|
#2
June 23rd 04, 02:33 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
London Underground "Extension" Walls
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:42:18 +0100, "Robin Mayes"
wrote: Is it not part of the JLE then anymore? There is no JLE anymore, is there? isn't it the EJL now? |
|
#3
June 23rd 04, 04:41 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
London Underground "Extension" Walls
"Robin Mayes" wrote in message
... "Laura-Ann" wrote in message news Thanks for the replies Guess it would make sense. Well, maybe not make sense for them not to remove/repaint the walls - I'm sure they have some really great excuse for that. Is it not part of the JLE then anymore? Why paint over something that isn't graffiti and is still technically correct? Perhaps there are more pressing needs to be address, like crumbling walls or offensive graffiti? If they're not actually doing any construction of an Underground Extension behind those walls, then why not change it? |
|
#4
June 24th 04, 09:12 AM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
London Underground "Extension" Walls
"Laura-Ann" wrote in message
news:8hjCc.117$kX3.70@newsfe6-win... "Robin Mayes" wrote in message ... "Laura-Ann" wrote in message news Thanks for the replies Guess it would make sense. Well, maybe not make sense for them not to remove/repaint the walls - I'm sure they have some really great excuse for that. Is it not part of the JLE then anymore? Why paint over something that isn't graffiti and is still technically correct? Perhaps there are more pressing needs to be address, like crumbling walls or offensive graffiti? If they're not actually doing any construction of an Underground Extension behind those walls, then why not change it? What would the business case be? Maybe you could go down there on your day off and overpaint it. If you do it neatly, no-one will mind. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| "Virgin Media wins London Underground wi-fi contract" | London Transport | |||
| Underground Staff - knowledge during "incidents" | London Transport | |||
| "The underground is closed" | London Transport | |||
| Piccadilly line extension to Terminal 5/Heathrow Express extension to T5 | London Transport | |||
| HSE - "grossly inefficient" and "dysfunctional" | London Transport | |||
Hybrid Mode
