London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old October 25th 04, 07:28 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,188
Default Bus lane enforcement

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Marc Brett wrote:

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:26:15 +0100, Dave Arquati wrote:

http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/n..._ca meras.php

According to the above story, TfL spent about £14m on bus lane
enforcement and received about £15m in penalty charges, resulting in a
"small" profit of around £1m - and a motorists' group is complaining
that they spent so much on it.


A pressure group deploys a selfish and irrational argument? My mind, i'm
afraid, remains firmly unboggled.

Surely if TfL had made a huge profit on penalties, they'd get even more
stick just like the police do with speed cameras?


The £14 million wasn't spent to raise revenue from penalty charges, it
was spent to make the buses run to schedule. How effectively was THIS
achieved? Did better running buses increase ridership? Reduce running
costs? Increase profits? If these goals were achieved, then it would
have been worth it even if the penalty charges didn't fully cover the
costs of the cameras.


Er, hang on. You're asking if the benefits justify the cost? The cost,
once you factor in the revenues, was _negative_! Even if it didn't have
any benefits, it'd be worth it!

tom

--
OBEY GIANT


  #12   Report Post  
Old October 25th 04, 10:31 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 515
Default Bus lane enforcement

Tom Anderson wrote the following in:


On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, Marc Brett wrote:
The £14 million wasn't spent to raise revenue from penalty
charges, it was spent to make the buses run to schedule. How
effectively was THIS achieved? Did better running buses increase
ridership? Reduce running costs? Increase profits? If these
goals were achieved, then it would have been worth it even if the
penalty charges didn't fully cover the costs of the cameras.


Er, hang on. You're asking if the benefits justify the cost? The
cost, once you factor in the revenues, was _negative_! Even if it
didn't have any benefits, it'd be worth it!


But it has to actually benefit bus speeds otherwise you'll get
motorists arguing with it and annoying newspaper columnists saying "You
Couldn't Make It Up!".

--
message by the incredible Robin May.
"The British don't like successful people" - said by British failures

Who is Abi Titmuss? What is she? Why is she famous?
http://robinmay.fotopic.net


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bus Lane Signs - Impossible to read - What's the solution Buttoneer London Transport 15 November 23rd 04 09:30 AM
"Camera Enforcement" on Tower Bridge Pete Boyd London Transport 10 May 15th 04 12:14 AM
Kew Bridge bus lane zerling London Transport 6 April 3rd 04 10:19 PM
Caught driving on a bus lane by camera - what to do? Volker Finke London Transport 46 October 11th 03 02:03 PM
Kew Bridge Bus Lane Suspended Robin Cox London Transport 6 September 30th 03 09:32 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017