"gwr4090" wrote in message
...
In article ,
gwr4090 wrote:

A group headed by John Prideaux is today
launching alternative "Superlink" proposals
for Crossrail which would see long distance
"intercity" type services through the central
London tunnel. This is more like the original
proposals for Crossrail many years ago, linking
places such as Bristol and Oxford with Cambridge
and Norwich. Apparently they reckon that this will
be much more profitable and provide better value
for money. I am not sure how they will deal with
GWML electrification issues.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspap...403749,00.html

Correction ! having now seen the map published in the Times, it appears
that the Superlink proposals are for outer-suburban type services:

Reading-Tilbury
Guildford and Basingstoke-Reading-Cambridge

How do the trains get from the Southwest Mainline to the Crossrail tunnel?

Heathrow-Stansted
Northampton-Southend, Clacton and Ispwich

Northampton to Ipswich via London? It would be quicker to cycle.

Also Tottenham Ct Rd-Dartford (?)

--
John Rowland - Spamtrapped
Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html
A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood.
That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line -
It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes

In article ,
John Rowland wrote:
"gwr4090" wrote in message
...
In article ,
gwr4090 wrote:

Correction ! having now seen the map published in the Times, it
appears that the Superlink proposals are for outer-suburban type
services:

Reading-Tilbury
Guildford and Basingstoke-Reading-Cambridge

How do the trains get from the Southwest Mainline to the Crossrail
tunnel?

via Reading apparently. This would be OK for services from Basinsgtoke
(assuming the line is electrified), but the map also shows trains from
Guildford routed via Basingstoke and Reading which sounds rather
improbable to me.

David

In article ,
gwr4090 wrote:
In article ,
John Rowland wrote:
"gwr4090" wrote in message
...
In article ,
gwr4090 wrote:

Correction ! having now seen the map published in the Times, it
appears that the Superlink proposals are for outer-suburban type
services:

Reading-Tilbury
Guildford and Basingstoke-Reading-Cambridge

How do the trains get from the Southwest Mainline to the Crossrail
tunnel?

via Reading apparently. This would be OK for services from Basinsgtoke
(assuming the line is electrified), but the map also shows trains from
Guildford routed via Basingstoke and Reading which sounds rather
improbable to me.


The superlink proposals are now available online at
www.superlinklondon.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

It is now apparent that it incorporates the Airtrack scheme and that
Reading, Basingstoke and Guildford would be served by trains via Heathrow,
in addition to direct GWML services to Reading. At the eastern end all
trains would serve Canary Wharf not Stratford. The proposals now make a
lot more sense, though I fear it will merely delay the whole CrossRail
project.

David

The superlink proposals are now available online at
www.superlinklondon.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk


It hardly looks like a serious proposal if it is published on the personal
webspace you get with a £25 a month blueyonder broadband account!

In message , GazK
writes



The superlink proposals are now available online at
www.superlinklondon.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk


It hardly looks like a serious proposal if it is published on the personal
webspace you get with a £25 a month blueyonder broadband account!

I want to know where the line on their map that shoots off west from
Ascot goes, because it certainly doesn't appear to be heading towards
Aldershot.
--
Spyke
Address is valid, but messages are treated as junk. The opinions I express do
not necessarily reflect those of the educational institution from which I post.

GazK wrote:

It hardly looks like a serious proposal if it is published on the personal
webspace you get with a £25 a month blueyonder broadband account!

It would help if the map was slightly more accurate...Colchester-on-Sea
anyone?

Strange that its avoiding Shenfield as well, meaning anyone wanting to
change there would have to go via Canary Wharf or Liverpool Street!


--
Darren

Sudbury Branch Line website: http://www.sudbury-branchline.co.uk
http://photos.darrenjohnson.co.uk

gwr4090 wrote:
In article ,
gwr4090 wrote:

In article ,
John Rowland wrote:

"gwr4090" wrote in message
...

In article ,
gwr4090 wrote:


Correction ! having now seen the map published in the Times, it
appears that the Superlink proposals are for outer-suburban type
services:


Reading-Tilbury
Guildford and Basingstoke-Reading-Cambridge


How do the trains get from the Southwest Mainline to the Crossrail
tunnel?


via Reading apparently. This would be OK for services from Basinsgtoke
(assuming the line is electrified), but the map also shows trains from
Guildford routed via Basingstoke and Reading which sounds rather
improbable to me.



The superlink proposals are now available online at
www.superlinklondon.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

It is now apparent that it incorporates the Airtrack scheme and that
Reading, Basingstoke and Guildford would be served by trains via Heathrow,
in addition to direct GWML services to Reading. At the eastern end all
trains would serve Canary Wharf not Stratford. The proposals now make a
lot more sense, though I fear it will merely delay the whole CrossRail
project.

The proposal appears to involve a tunnel to Newbury Park followed by new
surface railways through Green Belt land to Billericay/Ingatestone and
to Harlow. Not only that - there will be NO station stops on these
extensive new sections of railway between Canary Wharf and those
stations mentioned!

--
Dave Arquati
Imperial College, SW7
www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London

In article , gwr4090
wrote:
The superlink proposals are now available online at
www.superlinklondon.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

Looks like a lot of hot air to me! If it so hard to get Crossrail built, how
is this going to get built. For £25Billion! Carrying passengers paying
25p/mile. It can't be justified!

Michael
--