London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
Old February 15th 05, 05:59 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2004
Posts: 668
Default Barking-Greenford?


"TheOneKEA" wrote in message
oups.com...
Brimstone wrote:
All of which can be overcome, especially the loading gauge question.
I don't see tube stock clouting any of the bridges. between Ealing
Bdy and West Ealing. WRT to speeds, 92 stock accelerates quicker
than anything on the mainline and it's only travelling about three-
quaters of a mile anyway.


It's not a matter of the tube trains hitting lineside structures, it's
a matter of what you're going to use to get a defective 1992TS off of
the line when it can't move itself...


What do you use to move a failed D78 on the Richmond branch or a l65 on the
Amersham line?



  #32   Report Post  
Old February 15th 05, 06:03 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2005
Posts: 20
Default Barking-Greenford?


Tom Anderson wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, PaulBowery wrote:

What about this for an idea- combine the Greenford branch and

Barking to
Gospel Oak into a single service via Ealing Broadway and Willesden
Junction. This would provide an interchange between the North

London
Line and the west via Ealing Broadway. If paths in the Willesden
Junction area are a problem then some of the Stratford trains could

run
to Willesden Junction low level via Queens Park.


I do think killing the service to Paddington, or anywhere similarly
central, would be a bit fatal.

How about making the branch part of the Central Line? You'd need

about a
mile of four-tracking to get to the junction from Ealing Broadway;

would
that be at all feasible?

tom


Operationally converting the branch to be a Central Line extension
makes sense. The question is: Would the construction costs be
justified?

Adrian.

  #33   Report Post  
Old February 15th 05, 06:56 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2005
Posts: 20
Default Barking-Greenford?


One doubts the Health and Safety folks would allow any new cases of
tube and mainline interlining.

A.

  #34   Report Post  
Old February 15th 05, 07:02 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2004
Posts: 341
Default Barking-Greenford?

Brimstone wrote:

What do you use to move a failed D78 on the Richmond branch or a l65
on the Amersham line?


Somebody probably goes and finds a barrier coach. The DC lines once had
them to allow standard stock to mate with Oerlikons, to allow the
latter to push the former out of the way. I haven't a clue what they
use nowadays.

  #35   Report Post  
Old February 15th 05, 07:18 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2004
Posts: 668
Default Barking-Greenford?


"TheOneKEA" wrote in message
ups.com...
Brimstone wrote:

What do you use to move a failed D78 on the Richmond branch or a l65
on the Amersham line?


Somebody probably goes and finds a barrier coach. The DC lines once had
them to allow standard stock to mate with Oerlikons, to allow the
latter to push the former out of the way. I haven't a clue what they
use nowadays.


Probably nothing as methods of dealing with failed trains have developed.
It's extremely rare that an EMU can't be got moving under it's own power
albeit on reduced power.




  #36   Report Post  
Old February 15th 05, 07:19 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2004
Posts: 668
Default Barking-Greenford?


"Adrian Auer-Hudson" wrote in message
oups.com...

One doubts the Health and Safety folks would allow any new cases of
tube and mainline interlining.


The HSE won't have railways as part of their remit for much longer.
Hopefully sanity will return.


  #37   Report Post  
Old February 15th 05, 07:59 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,429
Default Barking-Greenford?

Brimstone wrote:
"TheOneKEA" wrote in message
oups.com...
Brimstone wrote:
All of which can be overcome, especially the loading gauge
question.
I don't see tube stock clouting any of the bridges. between Ealing
Bdy and West Ealing. WRT to speeds, 92 stock accelerates quicker
than anything on the mainline and it's only travelling about
three- quaters of a mile anyway.


It's not a matter of the tube trains hitting lineside structures,
it's
a matter of what you're going to use to get a defective 1992TS off
of the line when it can't move itself...


What do you use to move a failed D78 on the Richmond branch


Battery loco from Lillie Bridge or Acton Town?
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)
  #38   Report Post  
Old February 15th 05, 08:10 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2004
Posts: 668
Default Barking-Greenford?


"Richard J." wrote in message
. uk...
Brimstone wrote:
"TheOneKEA" wrote in message
oups.com...
Brimstone wrote:
All of which can be overcome, especially the loading gauge
question.
I don't see tube stock clouting any of the bridges. between Ealing
Bdy and West Ealing. WRT to speeds, 92 stock accelerates quicker
than anything on the mainline and it's only travelling about
three- quaters of a mile anyway.

It's not a matter of the tube trains hitting lineside structures,
it's
a matter of what you're going to use to get a defective 1992TS off
of the line when it can't move itself...


What do you use to move a failed D78 on the Richmond branch


Battery loco from Lillie Bridge or Acton Town?


The control systems on a D can be split in half, so that if there is a
failure on one the other can get the train back to depot. Even on LU metals
the need for an assisting train is extremely rare and only due to a
catastrophic failure.


  #40   Report Post  
Old February 16th 05, 10:30 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2004
Posts: 266
Default Barking-Greenford?

Adrian Auer-Hudson wrote:

Operationally converting the [Greenford] branch to be a Central
Line extension makes sense. The question is: Would the
construction costs be justified?

And which end do you connect it at?

Though a loop at both ends has its attractions from an aesthetic point
of view!

If tube tunnels were dug between West Ealing and just east of Ealing
Broadway, it would free up surface capacity at Ealing Broadway station
for the desperately-needed rebuilding.

There are endless options, and I think a wholesale reorganisation of
services might be beneficial, because
- the area needs north-south rail services
- the line parallel to the Central line is ridiculously under-used
- passengers beyond Northolt are not best served by an all-stations
service
- The Ealing Broadway Central Line branch will lose most of its
passengers to Crossrail

I'm thinking maybe a much enhanced Chiltern service from the Ruislips,
and new Central Line branches closer in: West Ealing via Castlebar
Park, and maybe something heading north into Park Royal.

Colin McKenzie



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Greenford Walter Briscoe London Transport 9 October 20th 09 03:12 PM
PAYG Ealing Broadway - Greenford Paul Corfield London Transport 14 April 18th 08 10:21 AM
Sightseeing in Greenford John Rowland London Transport 3 December 18th 04 12:33 PM
Trackbashers alert ( was Greenford Branch - two collisions today?) John Rowland London Transport 3 October 27th 04 09:16 AM
Parking near Greenford Pete London Transport 8 July 20th 03 01:20 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017