Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TheOneKEA wrote:
Colin McKenzie wrote: If tube tunnels were dug between West Ealing and just east of Ealing Broadway, it would free up surface capacity at Ealing Broadway station for the desperately-needed rebuilding. Indeed. Ealing Broadway is an excellent example of the brutalist architectural paradigm that gave us London Euston... There are endless options, and I think a wholesale reorganisation of services might be beneficial, because - the area needs north-south rail services Roll on the Park Royal interchange... Does anyone have news about that? I don't even have an estimated completion date. - the line parallel to the Central line is ridiculously under-used Because there's no capacity at Paddington. Considering that 14tph is going to terminate at Paddington, perhaps it would be sensible to see if electrifying Old Oak West - North Acton - Park Royal and running 6tph up there to interchange with the Picc/Central at PR might be useful. It would probably empty North Acton to PR and Ealing Common to PR, but the branches beyond there would get much busier; if the buses could be rejigged, the effects could get even better. A Park Royal bus/train/tube interchange with some sort of intermediate mode link to Willesden Junction and to Ealing to join the West London Tram. In any case, there should be high quality links to a Crossrail station to attract people from the west who might otherwise drive. Acton Main Line would be a good candidate. - passengers beyond Northolt are not best served by an all-stations service There's always the option of electrifying all the way to West Ruislip and interchanging with Chiltern - though that would probably decimate the Ruislip branch of the Central. A better option would be to find a spare bit of brownfield land next to the old GW line and building a largish carpark on it, with good access from the A40. Then you could extend more tph from Paddington to the new parkway station and abstract traffic off of the A40. Ooh, the old park-and-ride problem. I think you'd actually generate quite a bit of traffic on the A40 to the west as people switch from the current stations to the parkway one. A parkway station would be better off further out. Plus there's also the fact that Greenford still has an NR service to Paddington; if that does get cut back to West Ealing, adding a mini-curve to the Greenford triangle and running some of that wasted tph up _there_ could be investigated as well. Presumably there isn't the traffic for it, otherwise they would have suggested it. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Greenford | London Transport | |||
PAYG Ealing Broadway - Greenford | London Transport | |||
Sightseeing in Greenford | London Transport | |||
Trackbashers alert ( was Greenford Branch - two collisions today?) | London Transport | |||
Parking near Greenford | London Transport |