Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, asdf wrote: and they are seriously considering re-extending the Bakerloo to Watford and re-assessing the Silverlink services - they consider that there is an over-supply of service to central London between Wealdstone and Queen's Park. I think people here are underestimating how popular Euston is as a destination Very true. So, how about adding *more* trains to the Euston service, and running it on a tube-like basis? Rather than trying to stick to a timetable in the face of Bakerloos running about the place, just provide a high-frequency service without a declared timetable. That should simplify operations on the line - it would be just like other bits of track shared between two tube lines, such as the Met/Picc beyond Rayner's Lane. Obvious problems with this are the need for more rolling stock (bound to be some 313s knocking around they could use!) and the issue of terminating such a service at Euston - i haven't the faintest idea what the approach to Euston is like; is there any chance it could take 12 tph? The service pattern could look broadly like: Watford Junction - Euston: 12 tph Watford Junction * - Elephant & Castle: 12 tph Queen's Park - Elephant & Castle: 12 tph * Or Harrow & Wealdstone, if there really isn't demand. The original problem is that TfL consider there not to be sufficient demand to sustain the *current* level of service to central London (whether that's Oxford Circus etc or Euston only) - I highly doubt that an *increased* level of service would be viable - certainly not fundable. The plan is to reduce services between Queen's Park and Wealdstone in order to use the savings made to increase services where demand is too high for the service level, i.e. the NLL. That leaves capacity on the NR branch south of Queen's Park which could be used for ELL services. I have no idea how they'd reverse at Queen's Park; come to think of it, i have no idea how Bakerloos reverse either. To be useful, those ELL services really need to run through to Willesden, to make orbital journeys easier. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ever wondered, Mass immigration. We never wanted it. So who'sresponsible for it and why? | London Transport | |||
Silverlink Metro and Oyster | London Transport | |||
Why can we never get anything built around here? | London Transport | |||
TfL to get control of Silverlink Metro | London Transport News | |||
Silverlink Metro transfers to Tfl Nov 2007 | London Transport |