London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 9th 05, 08:50 PM posted to alt.nuke.the.usa,uk.local.london,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 42
Default The champagne is flowing in a South Wales junkyard today


"Anthropy" wrote in message
...


Why the top floor of
a bus?


You are a not a bright individual are you.


So you don't agree that the bomb would have killed many more if it had
been detonated on the lower floor. Strange almost everyone including
experts from "Janes" agree that it would have. No doubt you know
better and will provide us with your evidence.


And the tube bombs? You conveniently left those out.

What a cretin


Seems that you are indeed a cretin.

Er....well........still waiting for facts butthead


Nice evasion there girl.

Maybe Al Queda are getting a conscience.


Cite please.


Where are these facts


Excuse me. I was asking YOU to cite your evidence as to your claim that "Al
Queda are getting a conscience."

...what an arsehole


Yep you sure are an arsehole.

This attack was designed to minimise casualties, hardly


in keeping
with the US image of Islamic extremists.


"This attack was designed to minimise casualties" Bloody hell - I have
heard
some lame attempts to justify the actions of those that support these
criminals but that has to be one of the lamest. Think before you post.

"to minimise casualties" they would have:-

1) Not undertaken this act during rush hour.


How old are you? Have you reached puberty yet? Your pathetic
witterings indicate you are still in your teens, probably 13 or 14. Go
find a chat room. You'll find it more your level.


So instead of offering up a rebuttal you instead resort to yet more juvenile
insults I see.

If as you say "This attack was designed to minimise casualties" They would
not have chosen the time that they did. You fail to offer any rebuttal.


2) Given prior warnings to appropriate authorities so that evacuations
could be attempted. Even the IRA saw fit to give warnings.


Sometimes there were warnings sometimes there weren't. you obviously
have very limited knowledge of the subject yet you still pontificate,
what an idiot.


Temper dear girl. You are letting it get the better of you. You are also
clutching at straws and not making sense. Anyway you admit that the IRA
gave warnings. So if your heroes had intended to that "This attack was
designed to minimise casualties" surely they would have, in this case, given
out warnings. If - as you claim "This attack was designed to minimise
casualties".


They would then have caused the terror and stoppage of trade etc AND
MINIMISED injury and
death. They did not do so - therefore they did not intend "to minimise
casualties" as you rather pathetically claim


Christ you're a ****ing moron.


There you go with letting your temper get the better of you again.

Try reading a newspaper and you may
find stories suggesting that the attack is going to cost the UK
millions if not billions in insurance, less tourists, heightened
awareness from the security services etc.



Still you offer nothing but evasion - and you are also unwittingly proving
my argument to the cost of your own it must be noted.

3) Give prior warnings to cause terror and stoppage of London but place
fake
bombs to be found by Police etc after evacuation of Stations. They did not
therefore your heroes did NOT intend "to minimise casualties"


So you believe the criminals could not have made the bombs any
bigger??? or the poor broke criminals could only afford to buy 4
bombs?


Indeed they could have made them bigger - they did not need to it seems. But
is this really your only reason for thinking that "This attack was designed
to minimise casualties". As I said before - and you confirm with your
response - you have little if any understanding of the subject in hand.

For instance butthead,


There you go again. I have touched a nerve.

if they had really been after mass casualties
why didn't they detonate the bombs the weekend before in Hyde Park.
They would have got thousands.
It's obvious to anyone except ****headed warmongers who need excuses
for the slaughter in Iraq and Afghanistan that this was an attack
purposely designed to minimise casualties but to increase the fear
factor. The only question is why?


You have not made you case - but then that is because you do not have one of
any weight.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cycle Hire south western expansion goes live today Mizter T London Transport 3 December 13th 13 06:04 PM
The champagne is flowing in a South Wales junkyard today encyclopedia London Transport 16 July 13th 05 11:11 AM
The champagne is flowing in a South Wales junkyard today encyclopedia London Transport 1 July 11th 05 04:01 AM
The champagne is flowing in a South Wales junkyard today encyclopedia London Transport 1 July 10th 05 07:26 PM
Slam door carriage torn apart on BBC South Today CJG Now Thankfully Living In The North London Transport 16 December 23rd 03 01:31 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017