Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
thoss wrote:
: This happened in Reading about a century ago. The Berks/Oxon boundary used to be the Thames, then Caversham - the Reading suburb north of the Thames - was moved into Berks, and into Reading. We used to live in Appleton, Cheshire, in the early 70's. When the GPO decided Warrington was to be our postal district, we rebelled and used to put "Appleton, Warrington, Cheshire" on our letters, which the GPO didn't like because Warrington was in Lancashire (north of the Mersey). Letters often arrived with Cheshire scribbled out and Lancashire added. The situation was finally resolved when the moved the whole of Warrington into Cheshire in 1974 having invented Greater Manchester and Merseyside. (Actually, I think they moved the county boundaries, as it was easier than moving the town :-) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Underwood wrote:
You'd think that it would make sense for the boundaries between one "county" and another to be moved from time to time They are. Repeatedly. And it always causes arguments and wastes a lot of time and money. The problem is that as soon as a line is drawn on a map to enclose some particular area or not, people notice that generally it is advantageous to develop just outside that boundary because land or local taxes are cheaper. Thus the sprawl develops. The only way this will stop is to return to the days of greenbelt policy, and make the belts sufficiently wide and well protected. Fat chance. -- http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p14486547.html (37 073 at Wolverhampton, 1985) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DERWENT Zone 6 conquers ten further Southern stations...
10 Nov 2005 13:11:43 -0800, "Mizter T" [originally posted to uk.transport.london ] [ommitted to cross-post this to uk.railway ] [pls reply to *this* post- sorry for the mess] I'm surprised that no-one has referred to this yet, though it doesn't seem to appear anywhere on the Southern (or any other) website(s). I've seen a poster at a Southern station, which has been there at least a week, that states that from 2 January 2006, when new fares are introduced, the London's Zone 6 will be extended to include the following stations to the south of Croydon and Sutton: SNIP I don't understand why they didn't just invent a zone 7. Does this also mean that the Zone A tube stations will also be moving into Zone 6? PRAR -- http://www.i.am/prar/ and http://prar.fotopic.net/ As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it. --Dick Cavett Please reply to the newsgroup. That is why it exists. NB Anti-spam measures in force - If you must email me use the Reply to address and not |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm surprised that no-one has referred to this yet, though it doesn't seem to appear anywhere on the Southern (or any other) website(s). I've seen a poster at a Southern station, which has been there at least a week, that states that from 2 January 2006, when new fares are introduced, the London's Zone 6 will be extended to include the following stations to the south of Croydon and Sutton: SNIP I don't understand why they didn't just invent a zone 7. Does this also mean that the Zone A tube stations will also be moving into Zone 6? Probably because TfL have a long term goal of having fewer zones, not more. Also the inclusion in Zone 6 seems to be a Southern idea rather than a TfL initiative, probably just to make its charging "fairer" as it has adopted zonal charging for all its station within London. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DERWENT Zone 6 conquers ten further Southern stations...
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:19:14 -0000, "TKD" I'm surprised that no-one has referred to this yet, though it doesn't seem to appear anywhere on the Southern (or any other) website(s). I've seen a poster at a Southern station, which has been there at least a week, that states that from 2 January 2006, when new fares are introduced, the London's Zone 6 will be extended to include the following stations to the south of Croydon and Sutton: SNIP I don't understand why they didn't just invent a zone 7. Does this also mean that the Zone A tube stations will also be moving into Zone 6? Probably because TfL have a long term goal of having fewer zones, not more. Also the inclusion in Zone 6 seems to be a Southern idea rather than a TfL initiative, probably just to make its charging "fairer" as it has adopted zonal charging for all its station within London. Bet we see the Penalty Fare area extended to cover the whole branches then. PRAR -- http://www.i.am/prar/ and http://prar.fotopic.net/ As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it. --Dick Cavett Please reply to the newsgroup. That is why it exists. NB Anti-spam measures in force - If you must email me use the Reply to address and not |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Nov 2005 13:11:43 -0800, "Mizter T" wrote:
[originally posted to uk.transport.london ] [ommitted to cross-post this to uk.railway ] [pls reply to *this* post- sorry for the mess] I'm surprised that no-one has referred to this yet, though it doesn't seem to appear anywhere on the Southern (or any other) website(s). I've seen a poster at a Southern station, which has been there at least a week, that states that from 2 January 2006, when new fares are introduced, the London's Zone 6 will be extended to include the following stations to the south of Croydon and Sutton: Banstead and Epsom Downs Chipstead, Kingswood, Tadworth and Tattenham Corner Whyteleafe, Whyteleaf South and Caterham Upper Wharlingham Does this mean that passengers from these stations can no longer get railcard discounts on (off peak) travel cards and other journeys within the zones? If so, they will notice a significant fare increase. -- Peter Lawrence |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Lawrence" wrote Banstead and Epsom Downs Chipstead, Kingswood, Tadworth and Tattenham Corner Whyteleafe, Whyteleaf South and Caterham Upper Wharlingham Does this mean that passengers from these stations can no longer get railcard discounts on (off peak) travel cards and other journeys within the zones? If so, they will notice a significant fare increase. No, I don't think so. Why should it mean that? Are you suggesting that railcard discounts are not available within the zones? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Salmon wrote:
"Peter Lawrence" wrote Banstead and Epsom Downs Chipstead, Kingswood, Tadworth and Tattenham Corner Whyteleafe, Whyteleaf South and Caterham Upper Wharlingham Does this mean that passengers from these stations can no longer get railcard discounts on (off peak) travel cards and other journeys within the zones? If so, they will notice a significant fare increase. No, I don't think so. Why should it mean that? Are you suggesting that railcard discounts are not available within the zones? IIRC not on Oyster. -- Paul |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DERWENT Zone 6 conquers ten further Southern stations...
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:47:35 +0000, Paul John Salmon wrote: "Peter Lawrence" wrote Banstead and Epsom Downs Chipstead, Kingswood, Tadworth and Tattenham Corner Whyteleafe, Whyteleaf South and Caterham Upper Wharlingham Does this mean that passengers from these stations can no longer get railcard discounts on (off peak) travel cards and other journeys within the zones? If so, they will notice a significant fare increase. No, I don't think so. Why should it mean that? Are you suggesting that railcard discounts are not available within the zones? IIRC not on Oyster. Oyster is a waste of time on NR at the moment. PRAR -- http://www.i.am/prar/ and http://prar.fotopic.net/ As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it. --Dick Cavett Please reply to the newsgroup. That is why it exists. NB Anti-spam measures in force - If you must email me use the Reply to address and not |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DERWENT Zone 6 conquers ten further Southern stations...
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:59:18 GMT, "Peter Lawrence" On 10 Nov 2005 13:11:43 -0800, "Mizter T" wrote: [originally posted to uk.transport.london ] [ommitted to cross-post this to uk.railway ] [pls reply to *this* post- sorry for the mess] I'm surprised that no-one has referred to this yet, though it doesn't seem to appear anywhere on the Southern (or any other) website(s). I've seen a poster at a Southern station, which has been there at least a week, that states that from 2 January 2006, when new fares are introduced, the London's Zone 6 will be extended to include the following stations to the south of Croydon and Sutton: Banstead and Epsom Downs Chipstead, Kingswood, Tadworth and Tattenham Corner Whyteleafe, Whyteleaf South and Caterham Upper Wharlingham Does this mean that passengers from these stations can no longer get railcard discounts on (off peak) travel cards and other journeys within the zones? If so, they will notice a significant fare increase. No. Railcards still apply, and the majority of people will see ticket prices reduced (unless the January price rises are more than 20%). PRAR -- http://www.i.am/prar/ and http://prar.fotopic.net/ As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it. --Dick Cavett Please reply to the newsgroup. That is why it exists. NB Anti-spam measures in force - If you must email me use the Reply to address and not |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster PAYG: zone 2 to zone 1 via zone 3 | London Transport | |||
Livingstone threatens to levy a further £600 on Londoners | London Transport | |||
Further strike this Sunday | London Transport | |||
The Further Adventures of the Self-Deluding Dom1234/David Knight | London Transport | |||
Worst ten commutes | London Transport |