Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Howdon wrote:
There were delays on the Piccadilly line tonight but I found the station announcement at Acton Town most odd. Here is what it said (almost an exact quote) "Due to a signal failure at Hangar Lane - Rayners Lane and Uxbridge trains will be terminating at Northfields". Can anybody explain how a) a signal failure on the Central Line can cause delays on the Piccadilly Line? There are places on railways that are not stations. Just because there is no *station* on the Piccadilly Line called Hanger Lane (and let's get into another discussion on why there isn't one), it doesn't mean that there isn't a signalbox/junction/crossover/signal/depot/siding or whatever at that location. The Central and Piccadilly Lines cross near Hanger Lane / Park Royal. It's not inconceivable that there is a signal on the Piccadilly Line called "Hanger Lane". b) How trains to Rayners Lane and Uxbridge which do not go through Northfields can possibly terminate there? They mean that trains from Central London which should have gone on the Uxbridge Branch to Rayner's Lane, have been diverted to go onto the Heathrow branch instead; to avoid congestion nearer to Heathrow, they are terminating at Northfields. This presumably all means that there are no trains between Acton Town and Rayner's Lane. Richard [in PE12] |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Central line - new message | London Transport | |||
Odd-coloured Piccadilly Line train | London Transport | |||
new london discussion forum/message board | London Transport | |||
new london discussion forum/message board | London Transport | |||
Text message alerts. | London Transport |