Mizter T wrote:

John Salmon wrote:

(snip)

I'm glad you're getting to grips with apostrophes. It was you who posted
this, I think:

"Plus has Sudbury Hill Harrow looks like it loses it's 'limited service'
station
symbol simply because it's incompatible with the 'interchange station'
symbol"

Those are indeed my words from June '05. I do very much hope that you
haven't been silently brewing over my apostophe faux-pas for the past
year, and instead came across the aforementioned text by using a Google
search of the utl archives ;-)

(snip)


For those reading this on uk.railway - to which John has seemingly
crossposted this thread to merely to highlight my grammatical error
rather than spread any pertinant information about LU's third PPP
report - you can find the full thread including my initial post with a
links to a summary of the report over at uk.transport.london.