Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Jeff York
says... Conor wrote: My problem with Paul is that despite clear evidence to the contrary, he will fudge whatever figures he has to to suite what is needed to get him on TV/Radio/in the papers. Such as? TBH, we did it all to death a couple of years ago when he posted his ****e in here. -- Conor I'm really a nice guy. If I had friends, they would tell you. Earn commission on online purchases, £2.50 just for signing up: http://www.TopCashBack.co.uk/Conor/ref/index.htm |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David from Oz wrote:
There was an item on driving offence cameras (e.g. box junction offences, red light offences, right turn offences, bus lane offences etc), as following successful trials in London they are now being rolled out nationally. Paul from Safe Speed (a regular poster on this group) was interviewed and argued against such measures stating his view that that they did not *prevent * such offences, merely *punished* but did not reduce the number of offices. Hmmm , so an increased chance of being caught doesn't act as a deterrent at all........ I'd be interested to know what he would propose that could prevent someone blocking a box junction. -- Alex "I laugh in the face of danger. Then I hide until it goes away" www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr Zoidberg wrote:
David from Oz wrote: There was an item on driving offence cameras (e.g. box junction offences, red light offences, right turn offences, bus lane offences etc), as following successful trials in London they are now being rolled out nationally. Paul from Safe Speed (a regular poster on this group) was interviewed and argued against such measures stating his view that that they did not *prevent * such offences, merely *punished* but did not reduce the number of offices. Hmmm , so an increased chance of being caught doesn't act as a deterrent at all........ I'd be interested to know what he would propose that could prevent someone blocking a box junction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:T...achine_gun.jpg would probably work. Bit messy though. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tosspot wrote:
Dr Zoidberg wrote: David from Oz wrote: There was an item on driving offence cameras (e.g. box junction offences, red light offences, right turn offences, bus lane offences etc), as following successful trials in London they are now being rolled out nationally. Paul from Safe Speed (a regular poster on this group) was interviewed and argued against such measures stating his view that that they did not *prevent * such offences, merely *punished* but did not reduce the number of offices. Hmmm , so an increased chance of being caught doesn't act as a deterrent at all........ I'd be interested to know what he would propose that could prevent someone blocking a box junction. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:T...achine_gun.jpg would probably work. Bit messy though. Nice idea in theory , but the wreckage could end up blocking the junction for far longer than a three series.... -- Alex - posting using all 64 bits in widescreen :0) Hermes: "We can't afford that! Especially not Zoidberg!" Zoidberg: "They took away my credit cards!" www.drzoidberg.co.uk www.ebayfaq.co.uk |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dr Zoidberg wrote: David from Oz wrote: There was an item on driving offence cameras (e.g. box junction offences, red light offences, right turn offences, bus lane offences etc), as following successful trials in London they are now being rolled out nationally. Paul from Safe Speed (a regular poster on this group) was interviewed and argued against such measures stating his view that that they did not *prevent * such offences, merely *punished* but did not reduce the number of offices. Hmmm , so an increased chance of being caught doesn't act as a deterrent at all........ I'd be interested to know what he would propose that could prevent someone blocking a box junction. How about one of those electromagnet based wrecking cranes to lift the offender out of the way so that traffic can move freely again? And maybe leave them in the air for an hour or two as a warning to others. I think the claw type grab might be a bit too brutal. If you think we have a problem there are countries where traffic light discipline is so bad that without policemen on every junction at rush hour it all grinds to a complete standstill - think herringbone pattern of cars in every junction all moving and hooting at random. Regards, Martin Brown |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Martin Brown wrote: If you think we have a problem there are countries where traffic light discipline is so bad that without policemen on every junction at rush hour it all grinds to a complete standstill - think herringbone pattern of cars in every junction all moving and hooting at random. I've been at junctions where it ends up a free-for-all. The light goes green for one road but access is obstructed, so they go on red. And then it goes on from there - just go when you can. Many would say that if the lights don't do their job, that's probably the best option. Most gridlock (or starvation to be more technical) occurs where there are two signals in close succession, such that the space between the signals is filled quickly by one side and then the other side will have nowhere to go. Actually this is commonly the situation at Henlys Corner for the A406 Westbound. In the last couple of weeks they have been resurfacing and there is currently no box junction and the approach has become a lot emptier as a result. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-10-23, Earl Purple wrote:
Most gridlock (or starvation to be more technical) occurs where there are two signals in close succession, such that the space between the signals is filled quickly by one side and then the other side will have nowhere to go. Actually this is commonly the situation at Henlys Corner for the A406 Westbound. In the last couple of weeks they have been resurfacing and there is currently no box junction and the approach has become a lot emptier as a result. Going on to the Edinburgh Bypass (A720) somewhere near Hermiston Gate was the closest to that I've seen. A roundabout with traffic lights, and a heavy stream of traffic at 6 o'clock (me) and 3 o'clock. Every cycle, the traffic from 6 o'clock would stream onto the roundabout until a red appeared on the roundabout, then stop, queued all the way round the roundabout across my entrance. To move at all necessitated pushing out on the red as soon as a gap appeared (and before the traffic to the right started moving). -- David Taylor |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , alexNOOOOOO!!!!!!!
@drzoidberg.co.uk says... I'd be interested to know what he would propose that could prevent someone blocking a box junction. All the landmines that charities have dug up. Just re-engineer them to use RFID tags. And if the same tag is stationary over the field for more than 2 minutes. Boom, Kablamie -- Carl Robson Audio stream: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com:8000/samtest Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David from Oz wrote:
rolled out nationally. Paul from Safe Speed (a regular poster on this group) Which group? Has he been using an alias? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
surely as all the boy racers who have been complaining that speed cameras
only catch people who drive "safely" at 70mph in town and 120 on motorways should be glad that all misdemeanours will be caught on camera ? Now come the new excuses -------------- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Being told of your offence | London Transport | |||
Being told of your offence | London Transport | |||
Being told of your offence | London Transport | |||
Good Luck, Paul Corfield | London Transport | |||
No platform adverts at St Paul's | London Transport |