Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edward Cowling London UK wrote:
So there are large gaps in the service and lots of people either crammed onto trains or seeking alternative routes. Solution: run more trains !! I'm sure I remember Ken promising better transport if we had the congestion charge, and I've yet to see any improvements. There's also the question of WHERE do 'more trains' come from? In the peaks, First Capital Connect (as WAGN before them) utilise their stock to its maximum capacity. There is no flexibility within the existing fleet. OK, you say "get more trains in". Where from? The Class 313, which is the only dual-voltage train that is permitted to run through the tunnels to Moorgate, is only used on Great Northern services and on the North London lines by Silverlink (and their 23 trains were originally built in 1976 for GN services but were moved during the 1980s when the recession hit and GN services had excess capacity). Their are no other units of similar spec available. The generic Class 314s on Glasgow suburban services are also three-car units but AC only, whilst the Class 315s on Great Eastern services are four-car and AC only. All of those vehicles are also required where they currently operate. Even to utilise some of them (say the Scottish 314s, when they are replaced in the next few years) would create diagramming problems to keep the dual-voltage services to Moorgate separated from AC-only services, which would either have to divert to King's Cross or terminate short at Finsbury Park or Drayton Park. Similarly there are no additional outer-suburban units available from anywhere. All over the system the current resources are being squeezed to the limit and the DfT are doing nothing about authorising new stock to cater for the increase in passengers that is anticipated in the next few years. Realistically, all I can suggest that might happen is that FCC could take back the 23 Class 313s from Silverlink, to expand their fleet, in two or three years, when the current order for new Electrostar stock for the NLL and ELL is delivered. Then you might be able to squeeze some additional services through but, without platform lengthening (which isn't going to happen in the tunnelled sections), nine-car trains formed of three 313s is a highly unlikely solution. There is also the little matter that the 313s are thirty years old this year and will themselves be due for replacement within the next ten years, which might make expenditure on refurbishing the ex-Silverlink sets an unattractive option. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Tube lines now have live ETA boards | London Transport | |||
Direct phone numbers to WAGN stations | London Transport | |||
Moorgate - Closed to WAGN for 1 year | London Transport | |||
Oyster now available from WAGN @ Walthamstow Central | London Transport | |||
WAGN 'refusal' to give performance discounts | London Transport |