Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Compensation For Delays
No I think this is a valid point.
If people can sue a council because they trespassed on council land jumped in a pond surrounded by "DANGER. DO NOT SWIM" notices and claim the council should have made it harder from them to break into the land the pond was on. I think commuters who suffer daily stress, distress have a good case. -- CJG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Compensation For Delays
"CJG" wrote in message ... No I think this is a valid point. If people can sue a council because they trespassed on council land jumped in a pond surrounded by "DANGER. DO NOT SWIM" notices and claim the council should have made it harder from them to break into the land the pond was on. I think commuters who suffer daily stress, distress have a good case. The only people who suffer are those who are so inward looking that they don't have any understanding of the how this world works and try to work against it all the time. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Compensation For Delays
CJG writes
No I think this is a valid point. What is? -- Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Compensation For Delays
"CJG" wrote in message ... No I think this is a valid point. If people can sue a council because they trespassed on council land jumped in a pond surrounded by "DANGER. DO NOT SWIM" notices and claim the council should have made it harder from them to break into the land the pond was on. I think commuters who suffer daily stress, distress have a good case. The person you are referring to didn't win their claim. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Compensation For Delays
It was a dark and stormy night when CJG
nks wrote in article ... No I think this is a valid point. If people can sue a council because they trespassed on council land jumped in a pond surrounded by "DANGER. DO NOT SWIM" notices and claim the council should have made it harder from them to break into the land the pond was on. That claim failed at appeal... Grebbsy -- "All vampires suck, but not all who suck are vampires." (--B.J.Kuehl) :::Grebbsy :::::::lemon curry?::: |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Compensation For Delays
On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 22:14:37 +0100, Grebbsy McLaren
wrote: It was a dark and stormy night when CJG nks wrote in article ... No I think this is a valid point. If people can sue a council because they trespassed on council land jumped in a pond surrounded by "DANGER. DO NOT SWIM" notices and claim the council should have made it harder from them to break into the land the pond was on. That claim failed at appeal... Grebbsy CJG doesn't like the truth getting in the way of a good story.... Rob. -- rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LU delay compensation | London Transport | |||
accident claims in the uk compensation no win no fee | London Transport | |||
FCC compensation for days of disruption Bedford to Brighton line | London Transport | |||
Gerrards Cross - compensation refused | London Transport | |||
Underground delays = online delays | London Transport |