Is it possible to argue that the current delays through speed
restrictions following fear of rails buckling in the heat is because of
London Underground not having train rails built withstand this amount
of heat? And thus London Underground are to blame?
Just remember. Where there is blame there is a claim!
And you don't even want to hear my horror story for travelling today.
Mis-infomaton. No information. Finally giving up even listening to the
announcements and taking an every man for himself approach and that's
when I finally reached the general area of my destination.
--
CJG

CJG wrote:

And you don't even want to hear my horror story for travelling today.

no, we don't. Quit whinging and enjoy the nice weather.

No I think this is a valid point.
If people can sue a council because they trespassed on council land
jumped in a pond surrounded by "DANGER. DO NOT SWIM" notices and claim
the council should have made it harder from them to break into the land
the pond was on.
I think commuters who suffer daily stress, distress have a good case.
--
CJG

"CJG" wrote in message
...
No I think this is a valid point.
If people can sue a council because they trespassed on council land
jumped in a pond surrounded by "DANGER. DO NOT SWIM" notices and claim
the council should have made it harder from them to break into the land
the pond was on.
I think commuters who suffer daily stress, distress have a good case.

The only people who suffer are those who are so inward looking that they
don't have any understanding of the how this world works and try to work
against it all the time.

CJG writes
No I think this is a valid point.

What is?

--
Dave

"CJG" wrote in message
...
No I think this is a valid point.
If people can sue a council because they trespassed on council land
jumped in a pond surrounded by "DANGER. DO NOT SWIM" notices and claim
the council should have made it harder from them to break into the land
the pond was on.
I think commuters who suffer daily stress, distress have a good case.

The person you are referring to didn't win their claim.

It was a dark and stormy night when CJG
nks wrote in article ...
No I think this is a valid point.
If people can sue a council because they trespassed on council land
jumped in a pond surrounded by "DANGER. DO NOT SWIM" notices and claim
the council should have made it harder from them to break into the land
the pond was on.

That claim failed at appeal...

Grebbsy
--
"All vampires suck, but not all who suck are vampires."
(--B.J.Kuehl)

:::Grebbsy :::::::lemon curry?:::

On Sat, 9 Aug 2003 22:14:37 +0100, Grebbsy McLaren
wrote:

It was a dark and stormy night when CJG
nks wrote in article ...
No I think this is a valid point.
If people can sue a council because they trespassed on council land
jumped in a pond surrounded by "DANGER. DO NOT SWIM" notices and claim
the council should have made it harder from them to break into the land
the pond was on.

That claim failed at appeal...

Grebbsy


CJG doesn't like the truth getting in the way of a good story....

Rob.
--
rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk