Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "D7666" wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 3, 6:10 am, "BH Williams" wrote: 'Waterloo' eventually became 'Wimbledon'. Dartford was resignalled, but instead of the part-completed (built, but not kitted-out) box at Gillingham being used, it went into some of the under-used acres of Ashford IECC. This is the sort of thing I was thinking of - the BR SR 13 plan for Ashford was not the same as the new Ashford that is today, In terms of passenger-miles, the majority of the former Southern Region is probably controlled by about a dozen or so control centres. Yes and no - there are approaching that number of large panel/IECC boxes Waterloo/Wimbledon Feltham Woking Basingstoke Eastleigh Portsmouth (haha) Victoria Three Bridges London Bridge Dartford Ashford = 11, but the point about the SR 13 is they would have eliminated *all* other boxes, and clearly there are still a large number of those all over the present southern zone. So today instead of 13 large area boxes and nothing else, we appear to have 11 larg-ish area boxes plus quite a lot of other installations, some of which looking as if they will run on for ever. -- Nick Arundel was being mentioned recently as being upgraded to a power box but I think it will be at Barnham now. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Box Signal Box and Junction Road Junction | London Transport | |||
Southern keen to run pilot Oyster scheme | London Transport | |||
Thameslink 'BOX' | London Transport | |||
Box Junction Victory? | London Transport | |||
Box Junction Penalty | London Transport |