NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the passengers
living in the M4 corridor for whom Heathrow is
usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow Airport
or the M4 corridor and its passengers that live
there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an area
with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway more or
lesss followed the track of the Bath Road an ancient
track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present mainline
railway was initially proposed by Bristolians to move
their goods to London and the railway doesn't follow
the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say that
the two don't get close and even cross in one or two
places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track of
the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike" indicates
that the two are close to each other for most or all of
the distance, they're not. Except for a couple of
locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to get
from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a silly
answer, perhaps you should modify your interrogtion
technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on seventy-five
year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and now
you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a flying
**** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The fact
that you have got you knickers in a twist and are wriggling
around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.

I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on

Wriggly wriggly.

Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the passengers
living in the M4 corridor for whom Heathrow is
usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow Airport
or the M4 corridor and its passengers that live
there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an area
with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway more or
lesss followed the track of the Bath Road an ancient
track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present mainline
railway was initially proposed by Bristolians to move
their goods to London and the railway doesn't follow
the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say that
the two don't get close and even cross in one or two
places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track of
the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike" indicates
that the two are close to each other for most or all of
the distance, they're not. Except for a couple of
locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to get
from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a silly
answer, perhaps you should modify your interrogtion
technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on seventy-five
year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and now
you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a flying
**** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The fact
that you have got you knickers in a twist and are wriggling
around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the passengers
living in the M4 corridor for whom Heathrow
is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow Airport
or the M4 corridor and its passengers that
live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway more
or lesss followed the track of the Bath Road an
ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and the
railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say that
the two don't get close and even cross in one or two
places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track of
the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except for a
couple of locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to get
from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your interrogtion
technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on seventy-five
year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and
now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on

Wriggly wriggly.

Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the passengers
living in the M4 corridor for whom Heathrow
is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow Airport
or the M4 corridor and its passengers that
live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway more
or lesss followed the track of the Bath Road an
ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and the
railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say that
the two don't get close and even cross in one or two
places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track of
the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except for a
couple of locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to get
from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your interrogtion
technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on seventy-five
year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and
now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and the
railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in one
or two places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except for
a couple of locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and
now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.

Wriggly wriggly

Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and the
railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in one
or two places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except for
a couple of locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and
now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.

Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in
one or two places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except
for a couple of locations, they don't even get
close.
More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.

Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming

Wriggle wriggle

Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in
one or two places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except
for a couple of locations, they don't even get
close.
More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.
Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming

Wriggle wriggle


You still here dreaming away, I've been out and done the shopping whilst
you have been having your childish little paddy.

Dream on

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in
message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor
for whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to
an area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies
to Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was
just a convienient place to put a workshop,
railway more or lesss followed the track of
the Bath Road an ancient track and a
turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a
kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to
say that the two don't get close and even
cross in one or two places between London and
Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the
track of the Bath Road an ancient track and a
turnpike" indicates that the two are close to
each other for most or all of the distance,
they're not. Except for a couple of locations,
they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely
to get from you so I suppose it will have to
suffice.
Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question,
get a silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give
a flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter.
The fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and
are wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.
Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming

Wriggle wriggle


You still here dreaming away, I've been out and done the shopping
whilst you have been having your childish little paddy.

Good for you, but it's not me having the paddy. If it were you wouldn't keep
responding. (BTW - Some people are sufficiently organised that they don't
need to go shopping on the busiest day of the week.)


Dream on

Wriggle wriggle

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

"NM" wrote in message
...

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

tim..... wrote:

"NM" wrote in message
...


tim..... wrote:

"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
oups.com...


Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.

Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.

Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?

Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.

Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.

Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.

Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in
one or two places between London and Reading.)

Which is what I said in the first place.

You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except
for a couple of locations, they don't even get
close.

More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.

That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,

Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.

I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.

Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.

Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.

It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.

I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.

Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming


Wriggle wriggle

You still here dreaming away, I've been out and done the shopping whilst
you have been having your childish little paddy.

Dream on

Hey - you two are making a really nice pattern on Thunderbird.